Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lafargue v. Galloway, 167 So. 197.

15 citing documents.

Kelly v. Village of Greenwood 363 So. 2d 887 La. 1978
LaCaze v. Johnson 310 So. 2d 86 La. 1974
Allen v. Gleason 293 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Garrison v. Connick 291 So. 2d 778 La. 1974
Smith v. Washington Parish Democratic Committee 120 So. 2d 257 La. 1960
“It is well-established law in this state, as well as elsewhere, that, to contest an election, not only specific frauds or irregularities must be alleged, but it must also be shown that the frauds or irregularities charged did in fact alter the result.” , 167 So.
Dowling v. Orleans Parish Democratic Committee 102 So. 2d 755 La. 1958
Felder v. Police Jury of Livingston Parish 21 So. 2d 724 La. 1945
Beard v. Henry 199 So. 468 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Dumestre v. Fisher 195 So. 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Bell v. Guenard 195 So. 504 La. 1940
His allegations that these six ballots were erroneously rejected as spoiled are mere conclusions, and his counsel conceded that the petition sets out no cause of action in so far as this point is concerned, under the ruling of this, , 167 So.
Landry v. Ozenne 195 So. 14 La. 1940
Treadaway v. Plaquemines Parish Democratic Committee 193 So. 609 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1940
Livaudais v. Leovy 193 So. 613 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1940
Molero v. Rowley 194 So. 7 La. 1940
State Ex Rel. Todd v. Mills 184 So. 350 La. 1938
o. 28, Second Extra Session of 1935) provides that any candidate for office who claims to have been nominated and shall desire to contest the election shall present a petition to the judge, “which petition shall set forth specifically and in detail the grounds on which the contest is based and *9 the irregularities or frauds of which complaint is made.” , 167 So.