Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Callender v. Marks, 171 So. 86.

30 citing documents.

Randall Kling v. Troy Hebert Ernest P. Legier, Jr., in His Official Capacity as the Commissioner of the … La. 2024
See Theriot, 376 So.2d at 953 ( 171 So.
Batson v. Cherokee Beach and Campgrounds, Inc. 530 So. 2d 1128 La. 1988
In holding that a petition which sets forth no cause of action does not interrupt prescription, , 171 So.
Meyers v. Istre 379 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
he affidavit (“petition”) involves an interpretation of Article 1153 of the Code of Civil Procedure which states: “When the action or defense asserted in the amended petition or answer arises out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set forth or attempted to be set forth in the original pleading, the amendment relates back to the date of filing the original pleading.” , 171 So.
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Theriot 376 So. 2d 950 La. 1979
Meadoux v. Hall 369 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Trahan v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 303 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Evergreen Plantation, Inc. v. Zunamon 291 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
Community Acceptance Corp. v. Baton Rouge Health Club Management No. 2, Inc. 285 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
901 ; and Callender v. Marks, 1936, , 171 So.
Kreher v. TL James & Company, Inc. 274 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
Wilton Jones Company v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 248 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
Hayes v. Muller 243 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Phoenix of Hartford Insurance Co. v. United States Rubber Co. 245 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
National Surety Corp. v. Standard Accident Insurance Co. 168 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Breaux v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation 163 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
F. Miller & Sons, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 161 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Slaughter v. Gravity Drainage District No. 4 160 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Nettles v. Great American Insurance Company 155 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Stahl v. Sazer 141 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Ensminger v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. 134 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
270 ; Callender v. Marks, 1936, , 171 So.
McKay v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Company 123 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Martin v. Mud Supply Company 119 So. 2d 484 La. 1960
Kansas City Fire & Marine Insurance v. Hillman 118 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
Parenthetically, , 171 So.
Sizeler v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORP. 102 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
[5] See Callendar v. Marks, 1936, , 171 So.
Banks v. Kent Piling Co. 87 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Presumably, 'had or should the K & H Stock Farm been sued, , 171 So.
Houeye v. St. Helena Parish School Board 56 So. 2d 413 La. 1951
Lunkin v. Triangle Farms, Inc. 23 So. 2d 209 La. 1945
Peart v. Rykoski, Inc. 197 So. 605 La. 1940
Mitchell v. Sklar 196 So. 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Parks v. Hall 181 So. 191 La. 1938
Callender v. Marks 173 So. 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
892 ; and for the opinion of the Supreme Court, , 171 So.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by