DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bremer v. North Central Texas Oil Co., 171 So. 75.

27 citing documents.

  • Armour v. Smith 170 So. 2d 347 La. 1964
  • Namie v. Namie 134 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
  • Roberts v. Cooper 127 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    37 ; Bremer v. North Central Texas Oil Co., Inc., , 171 So.
  • Nolen v. Bennett 119 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    Bremer v. North Central Texas Oil Company, Inc., 1936, , 171 So.
  • Alexander v. Holt 116 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
    37 ; Bremer v. North Central Texas Oil Co., Inc., , 171 So.
  • Elkins v. Roseberry 96 So. 2d 41 La. 1957
  • Brown v. Mayfield 92 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
    37 ; Bremer v. North Central Texas Oil Co., Inc., , 171 So.
  • Delta Refining Co. v. Bankhead 73 So. 2d 302 La. 1954
  • Barnsdall Oil Co. v. Miller 69 So. 2d 21 La. 1953
  • Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. Thompson 64 So. 2d 202 La. 1953
    37 , containing ’ an exhaustive analysis of prior jurisprudence on the subject; Bremer v. North Central Texas Oil Co., Inc., , 171 So.
  • Wise v. Watkins 62 So. 2d 653 La. 1952
    684 ; Bremer v. North Central Texas Oil Co., Inc., , 171 So.
  • Placid Oil Co. v. George 49 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    37 ; Bremer v. North Central Texas Oil Co., Inc., , 171 So.
  • Hitzman v. Ethyl Corporation 42 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    In the case of Bremer v. North Central Texas Oil Co., Inc. et al., , 171 So.
  • Union Sulphur Co. v. Lognion 33 So. 2d 178 La. 1947
    Bremer v. North Central Texas Oil Co., Inc., et al., , 171 So.
  • Baker v. Wilder 16 So. 2d 346 La. 1943
  • White v. Hodges 9 So. 2d 433 La. 1942
  • Spears v. Nesbitt 2 So. 2d 650 La. 1941
  • Achee v. Caillouet 1 So. 2d 530 La. 1941
    659 ; (2) in considering the parol testimony offered by plaintiff tending to show that the mineral lease dated March 28, 1924, was not in the true sense a joint lease, and (3) in holding that the case of Bremer v. North Central Texas Oil Co., *325 , 171 So.
  • Hightower v. Maritzky 195 So. 518 La. 1940
    On the contrary, , 171 So.
  • Cox v. Acme Land & Investment Co. 188 So. 742 La. 1939
    In the absence of production, the term of the lease would expire on November 15, 1931, which was less than ten years after the servitude was created and, under the decision of this court .in Bremer v. North Central Texas Oil Company, Inc., , 171 So.
  • Vincent v. Bullock 187 So. 35 La. 1939
    519, 522 , quoted with approval from the case of Bremer v. North Central Texas Oil Co., Inc., et al., , 171 So.
  • McEachern v. Kinnebrew 184 So. 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    In interpreting the quoted article, , 171 So.
  • Goldsmith v. McCoy 182 So. 519 La. 1938
    There must be more than a bare acknowledgment; the acknowledgment must be accompanied by or coupled with ‘the purpose and intention of the party making the acknowledgment to interrupt the prescription then running.’ ’’ Bremer v. North Central Texas Oil Co., Inc. et al., , 171 So.
  • English v. Blackman 179 So. 306 La. 1938
    In support of that defense they cite the Mulhern Case, supra, , 171 So.
  • Kennedy v. Pelican Well Tool & Supply Co. 178 So. 359 La. 1938
  • Ventress v. Akin 177 So. 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
  • Coyle v. North Central Texas Oil Co. 174 So. 274 La. 1937