Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bienvenue v. Bienvenue, 172 So. 516.
- Lewis v. Lewis 404 So. 2d 1230 La. 1981
- Lewis v. Lewis 395 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Tisby v. Tisby 382 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
-
Rayborn v. Rayborn
246 So. 2d 400
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Article 926(3); , 172 So.
- Barr v. Freeman 175 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
- Viser v. Viser 146 So. 2d 409 La. 1962
-
Duncan v. Roane
127 So. 2d 191
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
237 , ; Bienvenue v. Bienvenue, 1937, , 172 So.
- White v. Morris 109 So. 2d 87 La. 1959
-
Thornton v. Thornton
99 So. 2d 43
La. 1958
The court rejected this contention and said that after the divorce became final “a separate suit ex rei necessitate is the only procedure by which the wife who has obtained the divorce can assert and enforce her right to the alimony * * , 172 So.
- Thornton v. Floyd 85 So. 2d 499 La. 1956
-
Hillard v. Hillard
73 So. 2d 442
La. 1954
plaintiff and defendant were separated and although plaintiff had sued his wife for divorce and was entitled to it on legal grounds, she remained his wife until the final divorce decree was signed, and it was as much his duty to support her during the pendency of the suit as before the separation, and, of course, it was his duty to support his minor child.” , 172 So.
- Eals v. Swan 59 So. 2d 409 La. 1952
- Younger Bros. v. Spell 193 So. 354 La. 1939
- Sherburne v. Iberville Land Co. 190 So. 227 La. 1939
- Bienvenue v. Bienvenue 188 So. 41 La. 1939
- Southern Coal Co. v. Thibodaux Chauvin 181 So. 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938