Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Robinson, 172 So. 429.

51 citing documents.

Bayou Bridge Pipeline, LLC v. 38.00 Acres, More or Less, Located in St. Martin Parish La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
App. 5 Cir. 3/23/18), finding that the trial court “arbitrarily exercised the discretion vested in him by law in refusing to reopen the case or to grant a new trial, which was manifestly in the interest of justice,” –98, 172 So.
David Pitts Jr. and Kenyetta Gurley v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Company and Rhoda Renee Jones, M.D. 218 So. 3d 58 La. 2017
Ron Warren, Ind & Obo Est. of D. Hebert v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Ron Warren, Ind & Obo Est. of D. Hebert v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Ron Warren, Ind. & O/B/O Estate of Derek Hebert v. Shelter Mutual Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Warren v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. 196 So. 3d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2nd Cir.1972); , 172 So.
Warren v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. 196 So. 3d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2nd Cir.1972); Succession *852 of Robinson, , 172 So.
Charles Henry Davis, Et Ux. v. Sabine Parish Police Jury La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Michael Burley v. New York Life Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Burley v. New York Life Insurance Co. 179 So. 3d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Caceres v. United Automobile Insurance Co. 154 So. 3d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The Lamb Court relied upon the Supreme Court’s holding in Hardy , wherein the Court reasoned that “the modern trend of the jurisprudence is to render justice upon the merits of the controversy, rather than defeat justice upon technicalities.” Hardy, 292 So.2d at 578 ( , 172 So.
Atkins v. Louisiana Mutual Medical Insurance Co. 105 So. 3d 781 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Lawson v. Mitsubishi Motor Sales of America 938 So. 2d 35 La. 2006
Smith v. Alliance Compressors 922 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Adrinner Smith v. Alliance Compressors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Willis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 747 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
We will attribute to the trial judge’s choice of alternatives the intention “to approve the meting out of justice upon the merits of a controversy, rather than the defeating of justice by applying technical rules in the trial of lawsuits.” , 172 So.
Washington v. GRAND CASINOS OF LA., INC. 715 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Oswalt v. STATE, DOTD 640 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Latiolais 613 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Holloway v. Gulf Motors, Inc. 588 So. 2d 1322 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Thibodeaux v. Burton 538 So. 2d 1001 La. 1989
Dawson v. Mazda Motors of America, Inc. 475 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Terra Builders v. International Paper Co. 445 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
2nd Cir. 1972); , 172 So.
Gilcrease v. Gilcrease 438 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Lamb v. Lamb 430 So. 2d 51 La. 1983
2nd Cir.1972); , 172 So.
Massey v. Ford 408 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Harrison v. South Central Bell Tel. Co. 390 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
David v. David 347 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Miller v. Chicago Insurance Company 320 So. 2d 134 La. 1975
Afeman v. Insurance Company of North America 307 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Hardy v. Kidder 292 So. 2d 575 La. 1974
Young v. Warner 283 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Sarpy v. Kliebert 250 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Johnson 242 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp. v. Alongio 169 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
See Succession of Robinson,- , 172 So.
Vela v. Slavich 162 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
State v. Lewis 142 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
In view of the language of the , 172 So.
Ardoin v. Robinson 129 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
100 ; Succession of Robinson, 1936, , 172 So.
Southern Natural Gas Company v. Roland 123 So. 2d 891 La. 1960
William Volker & Co. of Louisiana v. Allen 96 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
It is our duty to permit litigants all reasonable opportunity to place before us all facts bearing on the issues involved * * *.” The same court declared through Justice Higgins in Succession of Robinson, 1936, , 172 So.
White v. Morehouse Parish Police Jury 95 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Succession of Robinson, 1937, , 172 So.
King v. Burris 57 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
De Frances v. Gauthier 55 So. 2d 896 La. 1951
Appellant in support of his contention that he is entitled to a new trial cites and relies on , 172 So.
De Frances v. Gauthier 55 So. 2d 896 La. 1951
Appellant in support of his contention that he is entitled to a new trial cites and relies on , 172 So.
Rawls v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen Insurance Department, Inc. 35 So. 2d 809 La. 1948
We reviewed the jurisprudence of this Court in , 172 So.
Weinberger Sales Co. v. Truett 2 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Alexander v. Jackson 197 So. 137 La. 1940
Bell v. Holdcraft 196 So. 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Elchinger v. Lacroix 189 So. 572 La. 1939
It is not possible to reconcile the decision that was rendered in Stout v. Henderson, supra, with the more recent decision in Succession of Robinson (Opposition of Alexander), , 172 So.
Fogleman v. Interurban Transp. Co. 187 So. 73 La. 1939

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by