Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Drew v. Town of Zwolle, Sabine Parish, 171 So. 59.
-
Schwegmann Bros. GS Mkts. v. Louisiana Milk Com'n
290 So. 2d 312
La. 1974
351 , (1946); Drew v. Town of Zwolle, Sabine Parish, , 171 So.
-
Crews v. Cappell
277 So. 2d 150
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
A similar view was earlier expressed by our own Supreme Court in the case of Drew v. Town of Zwolle, Sabine Parish, , 171 So.
- City of New Orleans v. Delta-By-Products, Inc. 177 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
-
Silberman v. Beaubouef
175 So. 2d 873
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
Drew v. Town of Zwolle, etc., , 171 So.
- Emmco Insurance v. Dickinson 144 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
-
Cusimano v. Sigur
143 So. 2d 239
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
91 ; Drew v. Town of Zwolle, Sabine Parish, , 171 So.
-
Alphonse Mortgage Co. v. Saucier
138 So. 2d 849
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
91 ; Drew v. Town of Zwolle, Sabine Parish, , 171 So.
- Westside Transit Lines, Inc. v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 135 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
-
Warren v. Armas
107 So. 2d 638
La. 1958
See Lambert v. Lass, La.App., ; Drew v. Town of Zwolle, Sabine Parish, , 171 So.
-
City of New Orleans v. Langenstein
91 So. 2d 114
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
91 ; Drew v. Town of Zwolle, Sabine Parish, , 171 So.
-
Harris v. Pierce
73 So. 2d 330
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
Brooks v. Chinn, La.App., ; , 171 So.
-
Ducasse v. Modica
69 So. 2d 358
La. 1953
It is the approved rule that the granting or refusing of a preliminary injunction is merely an interlocutory judgment designed to preserve the existing status pending a trial of the issues on the merits of the case, and therefore the question is one which is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge.” , 171 So.
- Twiggs v. JOURNEYMEN BARBERS, ETC. 58 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
- Brooks v. Chinn 52 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
- Ridge Park v. Police Jury, Etc. 27 So. 2d 128 La. 1946
-
Felder v. Police Jury of Livingston Parish
21 So. 2d 724
La. 1945
When this petition, certified to by the Registrar of Voters as containing the signatures of more than 25% of the qualified electors of Ward 2, was presented to the Police Jury, it was its mandatory duty to order such election ( , 171 So.
- Watson v. Police Jury of La Salle Parish 16 So. 2d 208 La. 1943
- Ruiz v. Alfons0 1 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1941
- Frazier v. Police Jury of Winn Parish 195 So. 535 La. 1940
- State v. Bonner 190 So. 621 La. 1939
- Noe v. Maestri 190 So. 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
-
Pennix v. Webster Parish Police Jury
178 So. 390
La. 1937
96 ; Drew v. Town of Zwolle, 185 La, 867, .