DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Tyson, 172 So. 772.

20 citing documents.

  • Shorts v. Daniel 447 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • Himel v. Richard 374 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
  • State v. Hagerty 205 So. 2d 369 La. 1967
  • Succession of Cervini 97 So. 2d 215 La. 1957
  • Succession of Lapene 96 So. 2d 321 La. 1957
  • Goins v. Gates 93 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    350 ; Succession of Tyson, 1937, , 172 So.
  • Succession of St. Amand 65 So. 2d 780 La. 1953
    In considering a similar question in the case of , 172 So.
  • Succession of Wesley 64 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
  • Wallace v. Banks 52 So. 2d 858 La. 1951
    f defendant, the judge excluded evidence of general reputation and idle comment, and limited the proof of' paternity of defendant to the character of evidence prescribed by Article 209, Revised Civil Code (Article 210 being admittedly unavailable to plaintiff since the mother had made no oath of the child’s paternity and moreover was not free of dissolute manners), citing the , 172 So.
  • Sun Oil Co. v. Tarver 52 So. 2d 437 La. 1951
    523 ; Succession of Waters, supra; Dileo v. Dileo, supra; , 172 So.
  • Fontenot v. Vidrine 51 So. 2d 597 La. 1951
  • State v. De Lavallade 39 So. 2d 845 La. 1949
  • Succession of Cambre 27 So. 2d 296 La. 1946
  • Dugas v. Powell 21 So. 2d 366 La. 1945
    Counsel for the defendants have referred us to the case of , 172 So.
  • Jackson v. Gulf Refining Co. 10 So. 2d 593 La. 1942
    The plaintiffs’ ancestor, Gus Gibson, was recognized as owner of a fourth interest in the land, in the , 172 So.
  • In Re Gray's Succession 9 So. 2d 481 La. 1942
    As such, they are entitled to participate equally with their paternal brother, Silvestre Blasini, Jr., in that portion of the succession of their father, the two thirds, which he was forbidden by law to dispose of by will to their prejudice.” In the , 172 So.
  • Jackson v. United Gas Public Service Co. 198 So. 633 La. 1940
    *Page 5 Plaintiffs are the heirs and legal representatives of Gus Gibson, who was recognized as one of the irregular heirs of Louisa Tyson Gibson in the case of , 172 So.
  • Douglas v. Shepard 193 So. 264 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1939
    “ ‘Marriage may be circumstantially established by fact that for considerable time parties have openly lived together as man and wife and * * * acquire reputation of being husband and wife; such cohabitation and reputation being presumptive evidence of marriage.’ , 172 So.
  • Tyson v. Spearman 183 So. 201 La. 1938
    For a complete history of the facts from which this case evolves, , 172 So.
  • Tillery v. Fuller 182 So. 683 La. 1938
    523 , and in the , 172 So.