Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Baldwin v. Arkansas-Louisiana Pipe Line Co., 171 So. 442.

23 citing documents.

Nugent v. Franks 471 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Hunt v. Bowie 358 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
The rule is that when this is the case the act will be considered as not giving notice to third persons unless there is “reference to any deed, map,, plat, patent, survey, or boundary by which the description may be ascertained.” , 171 So.
Valvoline Oil Company v. Krauss 335 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
In support of this proposition, , 171 So.
Olinkraft, Incorporated v. Allen 333 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
806 (1941), where deadening the timber, conducting logging operations over the whole tract, and conducting moss-gathering operations by a number of men during two consecutive years on swampland amounted to possession; , 171 So.
Wurzlow v. Placid Oil Company 279 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
In support of this proposition, , 171 So.
JH Jenkins Contractors, Inc. v. Farriel 246 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Texaco, Inc. v. H. O. Roy, Inc. 229 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Descriptions ranging from “all other land in Caddo [and Bossier] Parish” [ , 171 So.
Cattle Farms, Inc. v. Abercrombie 211 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
1006 , ; Baldwin v. Arkansas-Louisiana *360 Pipe Line Co., , 171 So.
People of Living God v. Chantilly Corporation 207 So. 2d 752 La. 1968
175 , 88 Co.2d 17 , 171 So.
O'Meara v. Broussard 162 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Blevins v. Manufacturers Record Publishing Co. 105 So. 2d 392 La. 1958
Perot v. United States Casualty Co. 98 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
Gladney v. Webre 88 So. 2d 17 La. 1956
Code of Practice, art. 565; , 171 So.
Williams v. Bowie Lumber Co. 38 So. 2d 729 La. 1948
In support of this proposition, , 171 So.
Veltin v. Haas 21 So. 2d 862 La. 1945
Pierce v. Hunter 13 So. 2d 259 La. 1943
Schwing Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Board of Com'rs 12 So. 2d 235 La. 1943
Cupples v. Harris 11 So. 2d 609 La. 1942
225: “‘The description in a deed must be such that the property intended to be conveyed can be located and identified, and the general rule is that the description must fully appear within the four corners of the instrument itself, or that the deed should refer to some map,"plat, or deed as a part of the description, so that the same may be clear.’ ” , 171 So.
Daigle v. Calcasieu Nat. Bank in Lake Charles 9 So. 2d 394 La. 1942
being ‘all its present right, title and interest in and to all its lands in the Parish of Plaquemines, in the State of Louisiana.’ We think there can be no question but that such a description would not be sufficient to seize hold of particular property and support a claimed purchase of that property in reliance upon the public record.” , 171 So.
Dupuy v. Joly 200 So. 806 La. 1941
Neilson v. Haas 199 So. 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Snelling v. Adair 199 So. 782 La. 1940
489 ; Baldwin v. Arkan *641 sas-Louisiana Pipe Line Co., , 171 So.
McCluskey v. Meraux & Nunez, Inc. 188 So. 669 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1939

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by