Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dallao, 175 So. 4.

38 citing documents.

State v. Hall 549 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Seifert 524 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Roy 496 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Thompson 495 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Simms 465 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Bolton 408 So. 2d 250 La. 1981
State v. Badon 338 So. 2d 665 La. 1976
State v. Witherspoon 292 So. 2d 499 La. 1974
State v. Sanchez 284 So. 2d 918 La. 1973
Under this state of facts, we would be justified in considering these bills abandoned, and probably will do so under similar circumstances in the future * * * ” , 175 So.
State v. Edwards 261 So. 2d 649 La. 1972
State v. Elie 241 So. 2d 515 La. 1970
1376 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1958), in which the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the defendant’s motion to set aside the jury panel and to challenge the petit jury venire on the basis that the box from which the venire was chosen contained less than 750 names did not specify such an irregularity, even if true, as would warrant quashing the petit jury venire; , 175 So.
State v. Boutte 232 So. 2d 288 La. 1970
[850], State v. Delleo, [Dallao] , 187 La.
State v. Anderson 229 So. 2d 329 La. 1969
State v. Cardinale 206 So. 2d 510 La. 1968
State v. Cardinale 206 So. 2d 510 La. 1968
State v. Brown 202 So. 2d 274 La. 1967
State v. Jackson 202 So. 2d 264 La. 1967
State v. Simpson 175 So. 2d 255 La. 1965
State v. Simpson 175 So. 2d 255 La. 1965
State v. Fulghum 138 So. 2d 569 La. 1962
State v. Bickham 121 So. 2d 207 La. 1960
Hewitt v. Webster 118 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
State v. Kelly 112 So. 2d 674 La. 1959
He further contends that this evidence was such as could only be given by one familiar with firearms in general, or at least with that firearm in particular, and that firearms identification is a recognized subject of expert testimony — , 175 So.
State v. Michel 74 So. 2d 207 La. 1954
State v. Michel 74 So. 2d 207 La. 1954
State v. Shourds 71 So. 2d 340 La. 1954
State v. De Soto 60 So. 2d 65 La. 1952
State v. Haddad 59 So. 2d 411 La. 1952
State v. Jugger 47 So. 2d 46 La. 1950
State v. Simpson 43 So. 2d 585 La. 1949
State v. Vallery 38 So. 2d 148 La. 1948
State v. Brown 36 So. 2d 624 La. 1948
State v. Mattio 31 So. 2d 801 La. 1947
eriff, district attorney or police officer as evidence for the prosecution of a criminal charge, until after such public records have been used in open court or the criminal charge has been finally disposed of; * * It is noticed that this section excepted public records “when the same are held * * * as evidence in the investigation for or prosecution of a criminal charge.” , 175 So.
State v. Ledet 30 So. 2d 830 La. 1947
State v. Iseringhausen 16 So. 2d 65 La. 1943
State v. Jones 197 So. 249 La. 1940
State v. Livsey 182 So. 576 La. 1938
5 of Act No. 242 of 1912, as amended by Act No. 255 of 1920, § 3; , 175 So.
State v. Goodwin 179 So. 591 La. 1938
872 ]; State v. Dallao et al., [ ] 175 So.