Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hicks v. Texas & N. O. R. Co., 173 So. 745.

14 citing documents.

Tillman v. Public Belt R. R. Commission 42 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
O'Connor v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry. Co. 40 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
Howze v. Hollandsworth 26 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
Barnes v. Texas New Orleans R. Co. 16 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Rector v. Allied Van Lines, Inc. 198 So. 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
153 ; Hicks v. Texas & N. O. R. Co., , 173 So.
Eggleston v. Louisiana & A. Ry. Co. 192 So. 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Young v. Thompson 189 So. 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Applying the rule, as it has been extended in the case of Jackson v. Cook, supra, and as it was applied in the recent and somewhat similar cases of Hicks v. Texas & N. O. R. Co., , 173 So.
Patterson v. Yazoo M. v. R. Co. 187 So. 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Shipp v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. in Trusteeship 188 So. 526 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
153 ; Hicks v. Texas & N. O. R. Co., , 173 So.
Russo v. Texas & P. Ry. Co. 181 So. 485 La. 1938
153 and in Hicks v. Texas & N. O. R. Company, , 173 So.
Hantel v. Service Drayage Co. 177 So. 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
157 ; Hicks v. Texas & N. O. R. R. Co., , 173 So.
Russo v. Texas & P. Ry. Co. 177 So. 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
In the case of Hicks v. Texas & N. O. Railway Company, , 173 So.
Jackson v. Cook 176 So. 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Nor does there seem to be any intention on the part of the Supreme Court to depart from the doctrine laid down in the Rottman Case in the recent case of Hicks v. Texas & New Orleans R. Co., , 173 So.
Davidson v. American Drug Stores, Inc. 175 So. 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
153 ; Hicks v. T. & N. O. R. Co., , 173 So.