Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Kifer, 173 So. 169.
-
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS AMANDA GUTWEILER AKA AMANDA HYPES
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
art. 533, the legislature explained: So.
-
State v. Gutweiler
940 So. 2d 160
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
art. 533, the legislature explained: , 173 So.
- State v. Perez 450 So. 2d 1324 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- State v. Sinegal 393 So. 2d 684 La. 1981
- State v. Wisham 371 So. 2d 1151 La. 1979
- State v. Marchand 362 So. 2d 1090 La. 1978
- State v. Spotville 350 So. 2d 1194 La. 1977
- State v. Durr 343 So. 2d 1004 La. 1977
- State v. Fortenberry 307 So. 2d 296 La. 1975
- State v. Ledet 298 So. 2d 761 La. 1974
- State v. Evans 192 So. 2d 103 La. 1966
- State v. Progue 144 So. 2d 352 La. 1962
- State v. Scott 141 So. 2d 389 La. 1962
- State v. Rogers 132 So. 2d 819 La. 1961
- State v. Weston 95 So. 2d 305 La. 1957
- State v. Hoover 13 So. 2d 784 La. 1943
-
State v. Richey
196 So. 545
La. 1940
rule [Article 19] is that if the district attorney or any one else should be permitted to be present during the deliberations of a grand jury, the vote of members of the grand jurors might be influenced by his presence, and it is our opinion that public policy is * * * concerned in seeing that no one should interfere with the deliberations of a grand jury during its findings * * * , 173 So.
- State v. Saba 187 So. 7 La. 1939