Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Noel Estate, Inc. v. Kansas City Southern & Gulf Ry. Co., 175 So. 468.
- Webb v. Franks Investment Co. 105 So. 3d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
- Head v. Gray 938 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
- Bare v. King 842 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
-
Wagner v. FAIRWAY VILLAS CONDOMINIUM ASSOC. INC.
813 So. 2d 512
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
371 (2nd ed. 1997); citing Noel Estate v. Kansas City Southern & Gulf Railway Co., , 175 So.
- Martinez v. Tran Ossun Corp. 805 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
- Wetzel v. Khan 797 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
- STATE DOTD v. Unknown Owners 661 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
-
Village Plaza Partnership v. Brandt
501 So. 2d 781
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
[i]t is only necessary that the parties make clear their intention in the instrument to establish one.” Noel Estate, Inc. v. Southern & Gulf Railway, , 175 So.
- Heirs of Primeaux v. Erath Sugar Co., Ltd. 484 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- Porter v. Acadia-Vermilion Irr. Co., Inc. 479 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
- Texaco v. Newton & Rosa Smith Charitable Trust 471 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- Meaux v. Southdown Lands, Inc. 361 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
- Vangraff, Inc. v. McCearley 314 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
- Crow Drilling & Producing Co. v. Hunt 226 So. 2d 487 La. 1969
-
Mitchel v. Board of Commissioners
161 So. 2d 384
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1964
Noel Estate v. Kansas City Southern & G. R. Co. et al., , 175 So.
- Lillard v. Jet Homes, Inc. 129 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
- Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Texas & New Orleans R. Co. 127 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
- McGuffy v. Weil 125 So. 2d 154 La. 1960
-
Clark v. Reed
122 So. 2d 344
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
Noel Estate v. Kansas City Southern & Gulf R. Co., , 175 So.
- Dupre v. Dupre 72 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
-
Sun Oil Co. v. Stout
46 So. 2d 151
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1950
Noel Estate v. Kansas City Southern & G. R. Co., , 175 So.
-
Bonnabel v. Police Jury
44 So. 2d 872
La. 1950
It was pointed out in that case that the conveyance of a right-of-way to a railroad company for railway purposes merely granted a servitude which was lost by prescription for non-use for a period exceeding ten years, citing Noel Estate, Inc., v. Kansas City Southern & Gulf Railway Company et al., ; 175 So.
- Persigo v. Johnson Co. 18 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1944
-
Rock Island, A. & L. R. Co. v. Gournay
17 So. 2d 8
La. 1943
Noel Estate v. Kansas City Southern & G. R. Co. et al., , 175 So.
- Weingart v. Delgado 16 So. 2d 254 La. 1943
- Gulf, M. O.R. Co. v. Amacker 4 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
- Snelling v. Adair 199 So. 782 La. 1940
-
Parish of Jefferson v. Texas Co.
189 So. 580
La. 1939
ncorporated in .the act of donation, it is stated in the very granting clause of the act itself that the grant was made “under the terms and conditions hereinafter expressed,” and then are inserted in the act, as the terms and conditions, “for perpetual use as a right of way for Barataria Bay Waterway.” The case at bar is similar to the case of Noel Estate v. Kansas City Southern & G. R. Co., , 175 So.
- Jones Island Realty Co. v. Middendorf 185 So. 881 La. 1939
- Arkansas Improvement Co. v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. 181 So. 445 La. 1938