Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Franton v. Rusca, 175 So. 66.
- First Nat. Bank of Ruston v. Mercer 448 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- Succession of Cutrer v. Curtis 341 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
- Stanfill v. Johnson 258 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
- Arquembourg v. Bourque 243 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
- American Creosote Company v. Springer 241 So. 2d 510 La. 1970
- American Creosote Co. v. Springer 232 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1969
- Bash v. Sims 210 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
-
Terrell v. Wright
161 So. 2d 103
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
•• “This proposition cannot be sustained as it, of necessity, ignores the unbroken rule of law in this state, , 175 So.
- Dixie Pine Products Co. v. Switzer 111 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
- Loeb v. Candias 106 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1958
-
Smith v. Bell
68 So. 2d 737
La. 1953
on facts and articles.” ; 175 So.
-
Serio v. Chadwick
66 So. 2d 9
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
On appeal the Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the trial court, quoting from Franton v. Rusca, 1937, , 175 So.
- Matthews v. Gaubler 49 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
-
Lawrence v. Claiborne
41 So. 2d 680
La. 1949
This proposition cannot be -sustained as it, of necessity, ignores the unbroken rule of law in this state, , 175 So.
- Du Bell v. Union Central Life Ins. Co. 29 So. 2d 709 La. 1947
- Keller v. Rodrigue 24 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1946
- In Re Keller's Estate 24 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1946
- Krauss v. Fry 24 So. 2d 464 La. 1945
- Unity Industrial Life Ins. Co. v. Dejoie 11 So. 2d 546 La. 1942
- Derbonne v. Burton 189 So. 473 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1939