Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pitts v. Neugent, 175 So. 460.
-
Brown v. Globe Tool & Engineering Co.
337 So. 2d 894
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
694 , and California Co. v. Price, 234 La.
- Broussard v. Broussard 275 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
- Fontenot v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Company 209 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
- Eugene v. Ventress 209 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
- Succession of Favalora 169 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
- Quinette v. Delhommer 165 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
-
Johnson v. Lemons
157 So. 2d 752
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
Heroman v. Louisiana Institute of Deaf and Dumb, supra; , 175 So.
- Allen v. Commercial National Bank in Shreveport 138 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
-
Richards v. Crescent Towing & Salvage Co.
115 So. 2d 894
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1959
336 ; Pitts v. Neugent, 1937, , 175 So.
- California Company v. Price 99 So. 2d 743 La. 1958
-
Fouchaux v. Board of Commissioners
65 So. 2d 430
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
‘Matters once determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, if the judgment has become final, can never again be called into question by the parties or their privies, though the judgment may have been erroneous and liable to certain reversal on appeal.’ Heroman v. Louisiana Institute of Deaf and Dumb, supra; , 175 So.
- Sheppard v. Hundred Oaks Park, Inc. 61 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
-
Norah v. Crawford
49 So. 2d 751
La. 1950
“Matters once determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, if the judgment has become final, can never again be called into question by the parties or their privies, though the judgment may have been erroneous and liable to certain reversal on appeal.” Heroman v. Louisiana Institute of Deaf and Dumb, supra; , 175 So.
-
Federal Farm Mortg. Corp. v. Hatten
26 So. 2d 735
La. 1946
en obtained through fraud or other ill practices on the part of the party in whose favor they have been obtained (Article 607) and that such action must be brought within a year after the fraud or other ill practices is discovered (Article 613), otherwise it can never again be called into question by the parties or '.heir privies even though liable to certain reversal on appeal ( , 175 So.
- Adkins' Heirs v. Crawford, Jenkins & Booth, Ltd. 24 So. 2d 246 La. 1945
-
Succession of Fitzgerald
189 So. 116
La. 1939
* * * the judgment imports absolute verity, and the parties are forever estopped from disputing its correctness.’ ” , 175 So.