DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Boggan, 175 So. 66.

21 citing documents.

  • First Nat. Bank of Ruston v. Mercer 448 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    578 , (1937); Unity Industrial Life Ins.
  • Succession of Cutrer v. Curtis 341 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
  • Stanfill v. Johnson 258 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    578 , (1937); American Creosote Co., Inc. v. Springer, 257 La.
  • Arquembourg v. Bourque 243 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    578 , (1937), the court approved an award of damages for non-delivery of the possession of property which included the value of the loss of use of the land, as well as loss of time and expenses in connection therewith.
  • American Creosote Company v. Springer 241 So. 2d 510 La. 1970
    578 , (1937); and Garland v. Dimitry, 167 La.
  • American Creosote Co. v. Springer 232 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1969
    578 , , stated the well settled and unbroken rule of law in this State, citing many cases, as follows: “ * * * in the absence of any allegation of fraud or error, conditions, and stipulations beyond those expressed in an authentic act, and what may have been said before, or at the time of, or since the execution thereof, ca
  • Bash v. Sims 210 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
    578 , (1937); Maskrey v. Johnson, 122 La.
  • Terrell v. Wright 161 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    578 , , ‘ * * * that, in the absence of any allegation of fraud or error, conditions, and stipulations beyond those expressed in an authentic act, and what may have been said before, or at the time of, or since the execution thereof, can be proven only by means of a counter-letter or by the use of interrogatories on fac
  • Dixie Pine Products Co. v. Switzer 111 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    578 , ; Lawrence v. Claiborne, 215 La.
  • Loeb v. Candias 106 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1958
    578 , ; Unity Industrial Life Ins.
  • Smith v. Bell 68 So. 2d 737 La. 1953
    578 ; , 68 and Lawrence v. Claiborne, 215 La.
  • Serio v. Chadwick 66 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
    578 , , to the effect: "* * * that, in the absence of any allegation of fraud or error, conditions, and stipulations beyond those expressed in an authentic act, and what may have been said before, or at the time of, or since the execution thereof, can be proven only by means of a counter-letter or by the use of interrog
  • Matthews v. Gaubler 49 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    578 , , it was held that a petition by a purchaser under a warranty deed, for damages for the vendor's failure to deliver possession of part of a tract of land which was in possession of another, stated a cause of action under Rev.Civ.Code, arts.
  • Lawrence v. Claiborne 41 So. 2d 680 La. 1949
    578 , , “ * * that, in the -absence of -any -allegation of -fraud or error, -conditions, and -stipulations beyond those expressed in an authentic act, and what may have been said before, or at the time -of, or since the execution thereof, can be proven -only by means -of -a counter-letter • or by the use of interrogar t
  • Du Bell v. Union Central Life Ins. Co. 29 So. 2d 709 La. 1947
    578 , ; Derbonne v. Burton, La.App., 189 So.
  • Keller v. Rodrigue 24 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1946
    578 , : “It is the well-settled and unbroken rule of law in this state that, in the absence of any allegation of fraud or error, conditions, and stipulations beyond those expressed in an authentic act, and what may have been said before, or at the time of, or since the execution thereof, can be proven only by means of a cou
  • In Re Keller's Estate 24 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1946
    578 , : "It is the well-settled and unbroken rule of law in this state that, in the absence of any allegation of fraud or error, conditions, and stipulations beyond those expressed in an authentic act, and what may have been said before, or at the time of, or since the execution thereof, can be proven only by means of a cou
  • Krauss v. Fry 24 So. 2d 464 La. 1945
    578 , ; Unity Industrial Life Ins.
  • Unity Industrial Life Ins. Co. v. Dejoie 11 So. 2d 546 La. 1942
    578 , , and Johnson v. Johnson, 191 La.
  • State v. White 197 So. 745 La. 1940
  • Derbonne v. Burton 189 So. 473 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1939
    578 , , the Supreme Court held that a purchaser who is not given possession of property for which he has received a title, because the property is in the possession of a third party under a prior agreement with the seller, has a claim for damages against the seller for the loss of use of the property, the loss of time and e