Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Saia, 177 So. 238.
-
Gerald v. Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana
16 So. 2d 233
La. 1943
It is the law of this state that ■“where the plaintiff alleges facts affirmatively showing that he was guilty of contributory negligence, the defendant may raise the issue by exceptions of no right or cause of action.” Louisiana Power & , 177 So.
- Oubre v. Carondelet Bldg. 14 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
- Wilcox v. Lehman 12 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
- Waggoner v. City of Minden 9 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
-
Odum v. Newstadt's Shoe Stores
194 So. 81
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
220 ; Louisiana Power & , 177 So.
-
General Exchange Ins. Corp. v. M. Romano & Son
190 So. 168
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
The cases of Louisiana Power & , 177 So.
-
Hardtner v. &198tna Casualty Surety Co.
189 So. 365
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
In support of its contention that Richey’s alleged negligence was imputable to Hardt- *370 ner, defendant Insurance Company cites numerous cases, viz.: Louisiana Power & , 177 So.
-
Pittman v. Gifford-Hill & Co.
188 So. 470
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
l' for appellees urge, under the plea which forms the basis of the judgment, that “the petition on its face shows this plaintiff to have been guilty of such gross contributory negligence as to prevent and to bar any recovery in this cause.” In connection with this, they direct attention to the following holding and expression of the Supreme Court in Louisiana Power & , 177 So.
- Williams v. Campbell 185 So. 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
-
Hantel v. Service Drayage Co.
177 So. 425
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
537 , decision of Supreme Court rendered November 2, 1937, .