Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jackson v. Cook, 181 So. 195.
- Broussard v. Hotard 4 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
- Stansbury v. Drillon 2 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
-
Ryan v. Dendinger, Inc.
2 So. 2d 263
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Under this situation it becomes proper to determine whether or not the master of the Calla had the opportunity of avoiding the collision under the last clear chance doctrine as announced in numerous decisions of the courts of this State, , 181 So.
-
Thompson v. Dyer
1 So. 2d 433
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
After a careful reading of the testimony in the case, , 181 So.
- Law v. Osterland 3 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
- Fontenot v. Freudenstein 199 So. 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
- McClain v. Missouri Pac. R. Co. 200 So. 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
-
Boullion v. Bonin
2 So. 2d 535
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
The doctrine of "last clear chance" , 181 So.
-
Rector v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.
198 So. 516
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
This finding, together with the others above mentioned, , 181 So.
- Eggleston v. Louisiana & A. Ry. Co. 192 So. 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
-
Boissac v. Kleinpeter
191 So. 157
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Under this situation, , 181 So.
- Langley v. Viguerie 189 So. 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
-
Rutter v. Norman
189 So. 609
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
d Mrs. Rutter and realized her peril because, even if her peril was brought about by her own careless inattention, if it is shown that, after Norman, had he been attentive, should have realized that she was in danger and did not herself realize it, there yet remained to him time to avoid the calamity which ultimately befell, , 181 So.
-
Young v. Thompson
189 So. 487
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
But the confusion - , 181 So.
- Jones v. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co. 189 So. 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
- Prince v. Texas & N. O. R. Co. 189 So. 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
- Shipp v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. in Trusteeship 188 So. 526 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
-
Streetman v. Andress Motor Co.
189 So. 321
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
In such cases the last clear chance doctrine applies even though plaintiff’s negligence continues up to the accident.” , 181 So.
-
Bodin v. Texas Co.
186 So. 390
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
The duty of the truck driver, and his failure to discharge that duty, , 181 So.
-
Clark v. De Beer
188 So. 517
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Thus there can be no recovery herein unless the doctrine of the last clear chance is applicable; and this is obviously recognized by counsel for plaintiffs, for in their brief we find.: “ , 181 So.
- Jones v. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co. 185 So. 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939