Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Russo v. Texas & P. Ry. Co., 181 So. 485.

26 citing documents.

Ferrer v. Gilbert 436 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Simms v. Sims 181 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Wheat v. New Orleans and Northeastern Railroad Co. 163 So. 2d 65 La. 1964
Biggs v. Verbois 151 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Russo v. Texas & Pacific R. Co., 1938, , 181 So.
Pate v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 147 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Russo v. Texas & Pacific R. Co., 1938, , 181 So.
Askew v. Hamilton 146 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
unable to extricate himself; second, that the person against whom such doctrine is charged actually discovered or was in a position where he should have and could have discovered such other person’s peril; and, third, that at the time the person charged with responsibility could have, with the exercise of reasonable care, avoided the accident.” * * * See also: Russo v. Texas & Pacific R. Co., , 181 So.
Martin v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark 127 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
195 ; Russo v. Texas & Pacific R. Co., 1938, , 181 So.
Lavigne v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 125 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
*434 Russo v. Texas & Pacific R. Co., 1938, , 181 So.
Hoffpauir v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 124 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
153 ; Russo v. Texas & Pacific Railroad Company, 1938, , 181 So.
Moore v. Shreveport Transit Company 115 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
Benjamin v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 113 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Newton v. Pacillo 111 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
McElveen v. Gant 102 So. 2d 477 La. 1958
Bourgeois v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 102 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Chouest v. Remont 81 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Royal v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 75 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
391 , affirmed, 5 Cir., 140 F.2d 186 ; Russo v. Texas & P. R. Co., 1938, , 181 So.
Matthews v. New Orleans Terminal Co. 45 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
Tillman v. Public Belt R. R. Commission 42 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
O'Connor v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry. Co. 40 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
Howze v. Hollandsworth 26 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
Barnes v. Texas New Orleans R. Co. 16 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Howes v. Wimberly 15 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Brown v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry. Co. 14 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Eggleston v. Louisiana & A. Ry. Co. 192 So. 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Young v. Thompson 189 So. 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
If our interpretation of the allegations of the petition as summarized above is jusified, then we think the petition does set out a cause of action under the doctrine of last clear chance, or discovered peril, as applied by the Supreme Court in the recent case of Russo et al. v. Texas & P. R. Co., , 181 So.
Patterson v. Yazoo M. v. R. Co. 187 So. 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939