Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Williamson v. Enterprise Brick Co., 182 So. 556.

25 citing documents.

Skye v. White 391 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
2nd Cir. 1950); and Williamson v. Enterprise Brick Company, Inc., , 182 So.
Otis v. Otis 341 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Vaughan v. Fair 337 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Succession of Walker 288 So. 2d 328 La. 1974
American Supply Co. of Morgan City, Inc. v. Petrolane Offshore Construction Services, Inc. 289 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
In support of this contention plaintiff cites the following cases: , 182 So.
Pearson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company 281 So. 2d 724 La. 1973
Ammon v. Brown 273 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
In Williamson v. Enterprise Brick Co., Inc., , 182 So.
Aube v. American Insurance Co. 254 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
Edisen v. Edisen 236 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
App., (1st Cir. 1966), , 182 So.
Webre v. Heard 207 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
So-Cam, Inc. v. Atkins 189 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Rigsby v. Rigsby 180 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
987 , (1955) ; , 182 So.
Clark v. Richardson 157 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Chapman v. Lalumia 154 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
App., ; Williamson v. Enterprise Brick Co., Inc., , 182 So.
Hartford v. Mobley 98 So. 2d 250 La. 1957
Morgan v. Kent 83 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Counsel for plaintiff-appellant in his brief bases his argument for a favorable ruling upon his petition for a mandamus upon Article 601 of the Code of Practice which states that either party may require the Clerk to take down the testimony in writing and cites in support thereof Williamson v. Enterprise Brick Co., 1938, , 182 So.
American Adjustment Co. v. Batiste 79 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
In the case of Williamson v. Enterprise Brick Co., Inc., , 182 So.
St. Romain v. Bordelon 77 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
306 , Williamson v. Enterprise Brick Co., Inc., 1938, , 182 So.
Richards v. Riddle 58 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
Possibly the best enunciation of the principle is to be found in Williamson v. Enterprise Brick Company, Inc., , 182 So.
Tenner v. Griffin 53 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
Kenabrew v. Schneider 45 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
71 .” Williamson v. Enterprise Brick Co., Inc., , 182 So.
Hydrotex Industries, Inc. v. Cartwright 45 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
See: Williamson v. Enterprise Brick Company, Inc., , 182 So.
Campbell v. Marshall 28 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
In the above cited case Judge Taliaferro, as the organ of this Court, , 182 So.
Serpas v. Trebucq 1 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1941
71 , Williamson v. Enterprise Brick Company, Inc., , 182 So.
Chelette v. Roberts 185 So. 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Section 1 of Act No. 156 of 1912, as amended by Act No. 260 of 1918; , 182 So.