Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Squyres v. Baldwin, 185 So. 14.

35 citing documents.

Christy Robinette v. Old Republic Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Robinette v. Old Republic Insurance Co. 229 So. 3d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Barnett v. Globe Indem. Co. 557 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Adams v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford 543 So. 2d 480 La. 1989
Vanzant v. New Orleans Public Service 517 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Hutson v. Madison Parish Police Jury 496 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Whittington v. Sowela Technical Institute 438 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
McCoy v. Franklin Parish Police Jury 414 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Jack v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 392 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Frazier v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company 224 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
Malbrough v. Davidson 219 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Husser v. Bogalusa Coca Cola Bottling Company 215 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Beavers v. Butler 188 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
Rice v. Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Co. 187 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Fontana v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 173 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
Orrell v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 172 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
a joint enterprise and the purpose of' the enterprise was for the mutual benefit of each.” , 185 So.
Carter v. Canal Insurance Co. 154 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Bordelon v. Couvillion 130 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
McKay v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Company 123 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
See Squyres v. Baldwin, 1938, , 185 So.
Pierson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 107 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Senegal v. Thompson 91 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Rodriguez v. State Farm Mut. Insurance Co. 88 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Dickson v. Peters 87 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
Williams v. Barton 81 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
In Squyres v. Baldwin, 1938, , 185 So.
Smith v. Texas & N. O. R. 70 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
Ramsey v. Louisiana & A. Ry. Co. 70 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
The Supreme Court, , 185 So.
McDowell v. National Sur. Corp. 68 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
Herget v. Saucier 61 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
Arnold v. Illinois Cent. R. Co. 33 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
We are not *Page 99 unmindful of the importance of the question involved, however, a careful study of the facts and circumstances in this case and a , 185 So.
Arnold v. Illinois Cent. R. Co. 32 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
Domite v. Thompson 9 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
584, and affirmed by the Supreme Court under writ of review , 185 So.
Russo v. Aucoin 7 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
Woodruff v. Stewart 6 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
584 and by the Supreme Court in its opinion affirming this decision reported in , 185 So.
Weitkam v. Johnston 5 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
Barr v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 188 So. 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
On the same day the opinion in the Martin case was handed down by us, we rendered a , 185 So.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by