Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Guy L. Deano, Inc. v. Michel, 185 So. 9.

14 citing documents.

Russell v. Smith 671 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Creely v. Leisure Living, Inc. 437 So. 2d 816 La. 1983
Montgomery v. Vantiger 340 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Williams v. Bel 339 So. 2d 748 La. 1976
Lanneau v. Capital Transportation Corporation 292 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
art. 1945; Guy L. Deano, , 185 So.
Dutel v. Bitterwolf 166 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
The decision of the Supreme Court in Guy L. Deano, , 185 So.
Cox v. Green 70 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
233 , , Id., La.App., 181 So.
Walker v. Moore 68 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
After- the Boisseau case the Supreme Court had occasion to consider Guy L. Deano, Inc., v. Michel, 1938, , 185 So.
Cabral v. Barkerding 50 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1951
That question was determined in the case of Guy L. Deano, Inc., v. Michel, , 185 So.
Blackshear v. Landey 46 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1950
Neal v. Halliburton, La.App., ; , 185 So.
Neal v. Halliburton 19 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
In a well written opinion, the lower Court has clearly set forth the issues in this case and after giving its reasons for disagreeing with the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Deano, Inc., v. Michel, , 185 So.
Doll v. Russo 7 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
For instance, in Guy L. Deano, Inc., v. Michel, , 185 So.
Leaman v. Rauschkolb 1 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Leaman v. Rauschkolb. 199 So. 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
The facts do not permit that we apply the principle that was followed in Guy L. Deano, Inc., v. Michel, , 185 So.