Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Bell, 193 So. 645.
- Camel v. Waller 526 So. 2d 1086 La. 1988
- Lane v. Lane 375 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
- Guilott v. Guilott 361 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
- Phillips v. Nereaux 357 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
- Guilott v. Guilott 326 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
- Vicknair v. Vicknair 284 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
-
Succession of Pittman
282 So. 2d 799
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
"In support of their argument that this property was, in fact, the separate property of their father, having been acquired with separate funds `that he earned in the year 1944', Opponents have cited a line of cases beginning in 1939 with the Succession of Bell [ ], 193 So.
- Succession of Russo 246 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
- Hollier v. Fontenot 216 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
- Gouaux v. Gouaux 211 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
-
Succession of Videau
197 So. 2d 655
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
This principle was followed and restated in , 193 So.
- Ohanna v. Ohanna 129 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
- Southern Scrap Material Co. v. Commercial Scrap Materials Corp. 120 So. 2d 491 La. 1960
- Slaton v. King 36 So. 2d 648 La. 1948
- Thomas v. Thomas 27 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946