Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Moore v. Moore, 187 So. 670.

17 citing documents.

Cruse v. Cruse 498 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Berry v. Berry 310 So. 2d 626 La. 1975
Barron v. Barron 279 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
McWaters v. McWaters 209 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Swartz v. Swartz 191 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
On account of habitual intemperance of one of the married persons, or excesses, cruel treatment, or outrages of one of them toward the other, if such habitual intemperance, or such ill-treatment is of such a nature as to render their living together insupportable; * * *» , 187 So.
Carriere v. Carriere 147 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
Niemann v. Seeling 133 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Lavigne v. Schneider 129 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
is wife he replied “No,” and when asked if he desired to live with her as husband and wife, his answer again was “No.” Cruel treatment under the jurisprudence of this state is not confined to physical mistreatment, abuse, or injury, but can likewise result from mental harassment arising solely from conduct that is the “ ‘very refinement of cruelty,’ without either force or blows.” , 187 So.
Arnett v. Maryland Casualty Co. 116 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Lusco v. McNeese 86 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Tugendhaft v. Gehbauer 80 So. 2d 424 La. 1955
Dejoie v. Dejoie 70 So. 2d 398 La. 1954
Sollie v. Means 58 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
211 ; Moore v. Moore, 1939, , 187 So.
Coney v. Coney 41 So. 2d 497 La. 1949
Schneider v. Schneider 38 So. 2d 732 La. 1949
Wendling v. Aucoin 37 So. 2d 819 La. 1948
Sampognaro v. Sampognaro 29 So. 2d 581 La. 1947