Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hope v. Madison, 188 So. 711.
- Lee v. Constar, Inc. 921 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
-
In re Harvey Term Litigation
872 So. 2d 1214
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
In developing this definition, , 188 So.
-
Phillips v. Francis
817 So. 2d 107
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Co., the court, , 188 So.
-
Stovall v. Carimi
667 So. 2d 1107
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
In developing this definition, , 188 So.
-
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
616 So. 2d 1234
La. 1993
[4] In developing these definitions, , 188 So.
- Roberson v. Provident House 576 So. 2d 992 La. 1991
- Grant v. Politz 575 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Sanders 568 So. 2d 1025 La. 1990
- Moore v. Roemer 560 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
-
Knight v. Samuel
447 So. 2d 587
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
The Trahan court also cited, with apparent approval, the following definition of a , 188 So.
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. Theriot 376 So. 2d 950 La. 1979
-
Stein v. J. C. Bradford & Co.
360 So. 2d 607
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
905 , (1965), a prescription case, , 188 So.
- A. Wilbert's Sons Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Chaney 337 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
- Webster v. Rushing 316 So. 2d 111 La. 1975
-
Trahan v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
314 So. 2d 350
La. 1975
Defining the cause of action as "the situation or set of facts which entitles a party to sustain an action," , 188 So.
- Trahan v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 303 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
- Kreher v. TL James & Company, Inc. 274 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
-
Vidrine v. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Co.
268 So. 2d 233
La. 1972
The last cited case, however, , 188 So.
-
Hayes v. Muller
243 So. 2d 830
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
905 , (1965) ; Travelers Insurance Company v. Brown, 338 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1964); , 188 So.
- Mid-States Ins. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. 240 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
- Woodard v. Woodard 229 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
- National Surety Corp. v. Standard Accident Ins. Co. 175 So. 2d 263 La. 1965
-
National Surety Corp. v. Standard Accident Insurance
175 So. 2d 263
La. 1965
When the pleading presenting the judicial demand is filed in an incompetent court, or in an improper venue, prescription is interrupted as to the defendant served by the service of process.” 4 , 188 So.
-
Dupre v. Consolidated Underwriters
99 So. 2d 522
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
A cause of action is "the situation or state of facts which entitles a party to sustain an action", i. e., which gives him "a right to judicial interference in his behalf," , 188 So.
- Roy O. Martin Lumber Co. v. Scalfi 92 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
- State ex rel. Stansberry v. Stansberry 83 So. 2d 890 La. 1955
- Horn v. Lee 68 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
- Lobell ex rel. Hardware Mut. Cas. Co. v. Neal 48 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
- Parker v. Home Indemnity Co. of New York 41 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
- Bayou Rapides Lumber Co. v. Campbell 41 So. 2d 781 La. 1949
- Gadlin v. Deggs 23 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
-
Lloveras v. Reichert
200 So. 817
La. 1941
Defendant pleaded res judicata, predicating his plea on a , 188 So.
- Wetherbee v. Lodwick Lumber Co. 193 So. 671 La. 1940
-
Hope v. Madison
193 So. 666
La. 1940
This is an action under the provisions of Article 2447 of the Revised Civil Code to have the nullity of a certain instrument judicially recognized and is a , 188 So.
- Boat Service Co. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. 191 So. 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939