Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Aleman v. Sewerage and Water Board, 199 So. 380.
- Barnes v. LM Massey, Inc. 612 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- Culotta v. Police Jury of Ascension Parish 316 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
-
Mouledous v. State ex rel. Department of Highways
281 So. 2d 289
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
1069 , (1948); Aleman v. Sewerage & Water Board, , 199 So.
-
State, Department of Highways v. Mouledous
199 So. 2d 185
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
1069 , , 2 A.L.R.2d 666 ; , 199 So.
-
XL Finance Company v. Fenske
197 So. 2d 182
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Aleman v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, , 199 So.
-
Gray v. State, Through Department of Highways
191 So. 2d 802
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
of property not physically appropriated or invaded, the cited decisions merely distinguishing the tort action thus involved from a cause of action for the intentional damaging of property for a public purpose (for which under Article I, Section 2, Louisiana Constitution, the property owner must be compensated by the State regardless of negligence on its part): , 199 So.
- Veillon v. Columbia Gulf Transmission Company 192 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
- Hanemann v. Deep South Dismantling Co. 185 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
- Kendall v. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways 168 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
-
East v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation
168 So. 2d 426
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
1 Cir., ; Aleman v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, , 199 So.
-
Metoyer v. Sewerage & Water Board
100 So. 2d 792
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
In fact, the Supreme Court itself, in a case which went directly to it on appeal, considered a question very closely akin to that before us, , 199 So.
- Beck v. Boh Bros. Const. Co. 72 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
- Hebert v. TL James & Co. 72 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
-
Harrison v. Louisiana Highway Commission
11 So. 2d 612
La. 1942
But the distinction between a tort action and an action like this, for compensation for damaging of private property for a public purpose, was pointed out in the case of Aleman v. Sewerage & Water Board, , 199 So.