Manuel v. Employers' Fire Insurance
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., April 28, 1961 129 So. 2d 325; La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., December 4, 1928 120 So. 86; La., October 15, 1893 45 La. Ann. 1170; La., July 15, 1873 25 La. Ann. 560
Manuel v. Employers' Fire Insurance, 136 So. 2d 282 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961).
Cited by
- Advertiser, Division of the Independent, Inc. v. Tubbs 203 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
- Kleb v. Choate 203 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
- Forman v. May 201 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
- Abramson v. Piazza 198 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
- Manuel v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Company 136 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Manuel v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Company 136 So. 2d 275
- Duplechin v. Carolina Casualty Insurance 136 So. 2d 281
- Spiers v. Davidson 228 La. 632
- Fortenberry v. Mitchell 88 So. 2d 729
Opinion text
HOOD, Judge. This suit was instituted by Gustave Manuel against the Employers’ Fire Insurance Company and Oil Field Truck Lines, Inc., arising out of a motor vehicle collision which occurred on January 27, 1960, as a result of which collision plaintiff’s wife, Mrs. Mona Ardoin Manuel, was killed. Answers were filed by the defendants, but the case has never been tried and no final judgment has been rendered or signed. The case was consolidated for the trial of certain exceptions with suits entitled Manuel v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Company et al., La.App., 136 So.2d 275 ; Duplechin et al. v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Company et al., La.App., 136 So.2d 281 ; and Manuel et al. v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Co. et al., La.App., 136 So.2d 282 . Judgments were rendered by the trial court sustaining the exceptions in each of the above cited cases, and plaintiffs in those suits have appealed. Although the record does not reflect that an appeal was taken in this case, the record has been lodged in this court and counsel for all parties have filed written briefs and have made oral arguments, in spite of the fact that no final judgment has been rendered. No appeal lies in a case before judgment is rendered or before it is signed, and in such a case the appeal is premature and must be dismissed. LSA-C.C.P. Art. 2083, Spiers v. Davidson, 228 La. 632 , 83 So.2d 653 ; Frazier v. Muse, La.App. 1 Cir., 88 So.2d 729 . For the reasons herein assigned, the appeal in this case is dismissed. All costs of this appeal are assessed to plaintiff-appellant. Dismissed.