DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Martin, 189 So. 109.

15 citing documents.

  • State v. Richard 158 So. 2d 828 La. 1963
  • STATE EX REL. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS v. Bergeron 106 So. 2d 295 La. 1958
  • State v. Verret 87 So. 2d 297 La. 1956
    In State v. Martin [ ] 189 So.
  • Succession of GAMBINO 73 So. 2d 800 La. 1954
  • Roberts v. Caddo Parish School Board 34 So. 2d 916 La. 1948
  • State v. Shotts 22 So. 2d 209 La. 1945
    [6] The identical issue on which counsel’s other attack on the constitutionality of Act 14 -of 1934, 2d Ex.Sess., is based (that the body of the act is broader than its title because no reference is made in the title to the fact that mere possession of a narcotic constitutes a crime) , 189 So.
  • State v. Shotts 22 So. 2d 209 La. 1945
    The identical issue on which counsel's other attack on the constitutionality of Act 14 of 1934, 2d Ex.Sess., is based (that the body of the act is broader than its title because no reference is made in the title to the fact that mere possession of a narcotic constitutes a crime) , 189 So.
  • Bethlehem Supply Co. v. Pan-Southern Petroleum Corp. 20 So. 2d 737 La. 1944
    72 , and authorities therein cited; , 189 So.
  • State v. Pete 20 So. 2d 368 La. 1944
    The contention that these acts are in violation of Section 16 of Article III of the Constitution is equally without merit, for it is the settled jurisprudence of this state, , 189 So.
  • Womack v. Varnado 16 So. 2d 825 La. 1943
  • Peck v. City of New Orleans 5 So. 2d 508 La. 1941
  • Stewart v. Stanley 5 So. 2d 531 La. 1941
  • Ramey v. Cudahy Packing Co. 200 So. 333 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1941
    This is the rule prevailing everywhere for the construction of such a constitutional provision.” , 189 So.
  • State v. Martin 192 So. 694 La. 1939
  • Jackson v. Hart 190 So. 220 La. 1939
    In State v. Martin, La.Sup., , recently decided, this Court quoted and approved the statement of the prevailing rule announced in Corpus Juris, volume 59, page 809, viz.: “In determining the sufficiency of the title of a statute, under a constitutional provision requiring the subject of an act to be expressed in its title, its language shoul