Government Employees Insurance Co. v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., July 13, 1971 251 So. 2d 67; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., March 24, 1952 57 So. 2d 800; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., July 1, 1929 123 So. 466
Government Employees Insurance Co. v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., 224 So. 2d 819 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969).
Cited by
- Swindoll v. Wilson 224 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
- Wilson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 224 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Swindoll v. Wilson 224 So. 2d 817
- Wilson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 224 So. 2d 818
Opinion text
REGAN, Judge. The plaintiffs, Government Employees Insurance Company, and James M. Burlin-game, filed this suit against the defendants, State Farm Mutual Insurance Company, the liability insurer of Mrs. Sarah Swindoll, and Willie Wilson, endeavoring to recover the respective sums of $182.80 and $100.00 representing property damage to the Burlingame vehicle which they assert was incurred as the result of the negligence of the defendants. After a trial on the merits, the lower court rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs against Willie Wilson only, and from this judgment the defendant, Wilson, has prosecuted this appeal. This case was consolidated with “Al Swindoll, John F. Swindoll, and Alva Louise, et al. v. Willie Wilson, et al., 224 So.2d 817” in which the plaintiffs seeks to recover damages for the death of their wife and mother caused by the negligence of the defendant, Wilson. This case was also consolidated with “Willie Wilson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 224 So.2d 818 in which the plaintiff sought to recover for damages which he asserts he sustained as the result of the negligence of Sarah Swindoll in the operation of her motor vehicle. For the reasons assigned therein, the judgment of the lower court in favor of the plaintiffs and against defendant, Wilson, is affirmed. The defendant is to pay all costs of this appeal. Affirmed.