Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jackson v. Hart, 190 So. 220.
- Parish of Jefferson v. Louisiana Department of Corrections 254 So. 2d 582 La. 1971
- Branton v. Parker 233 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
- Associated General Contractors of America v. Police Jury of Pointe Coupee Parish 225 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
- State ex rel. Clark v. Hillebrandt 154 So. 2d 384 La. 1963
- STATE EX REL. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS v. Bergeron 106 So. 2d 295 La. 1958
-
Coulon v. Anthony Hamlin, Inc.
98 So. 2d 193
La. 1957
tack on the constitutionality of Act 156 of 1912, it was specifically recognized that provisions of the fee bill, rather than being repealed by the privilege of *803 proceeding in forma pauperis, were “recognized by the act itself, because it creates an exception in favor of a pauper litigant with the proviso that should he be cast he shall be condemned for costs (section 4), * * , at page 1078, 190 So.
-
Coulon v. Anthony Hamlin, Inc.
93 So. 2d 557
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
“ ‘Hence the statute only relieves pauper citizens of this state of the obligation of paying court costs in advance or as they accrue or furnishing bond and security for such costs..’ ” *564 Strangely enough the Supreme Court itself, , 190 So.
-
State v. Verret
87 So. 2d 297
La. 1956
f the Louisiana Constitution of 1921, as amended, held by the district court to have been violated in the enactment of Act 194 of 1952, provides in part: “Every statute enacted by the Legislature shall embrace but one object, and shall have a title indicative of its object.” , 190 So.
- Succession of GAMBINO 73 So. 2d 800 La. 1954
- Roberts v. Caddo Parish School Board 34 So. 2d 916 La. 1948
- Bethlehem Supply Co. v. Pan-Southern Petroleum Corp. 20 So. 2d 737 La. 1944
-
Ricks v. Department of State Civil Service
8 So. 2d 49
La. 1942
This is the rule prevailing everywhere for the construction of such a constitutional provision.” , 190 So.
- Peck v. City of New Orleans 5 So. 2d 508 La. 1941
- Stewart v. Stanley 5 So. 2d 531 La. 1941
-
Ramey v. Cudahy Packing Co.
200 So. 333
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1941
Art. 31 of the Constitution of 1898 and 1913 reads: “Every law enacted by the General Assembly shall embrace but one object, and that shall be expressed in its title.” Commenting upon the effect of the change in wording of this provision, wrought by the 1921 Constitution, Justice Rogers, , 190 So.
-
Burglass v. Burglass
193 So. 275
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
In Jackson v. Hart, et al., , 190 So.