Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Louisiana Highway Commission v. Israel, 17 So. 2d 914.

40 citing documents.

Consolidated Sewerage District of the City of Kenner v. Guenther 387 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
CONSOLIDATED SEWERAGE DIST. ETC. v. Schulin 387 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
City of New Orleans v. Cloutet 296 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
[3] , ; Lafayette Airport Commission v. Roy, La.App., ; State, Department of Highways v. Cartlidge, La.App., ; State, Department of Highways v. Wolfe, La.App., ; City of New Orleans v. Paltron, La.App., .
Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Stipe 231 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Texas Pipe Line Co. v. Barbe, 229 La.
State, Department of Highways v. Talbot 200 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Texas Pipe Line Co. v. Barbe, 229 La.
Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Greenwald 188 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
Housing Authority of Shreveport v. Green, supra; , (1944); Louisiana Highway Commission v. Paciera, 205 La.
Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Roy 198 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
“Housing Authority of Shreveport v. Green, supra; , (1944); Louisiana Highway Commission v. Paciera, 205 La.
Petrovich v. State 181 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
1069 , , 2 A.L.R.2d 666 (1948); Bernard v. State, La.App., (1961); Cousin v. Hornsby, La.App., (1st C. of A. 1956); , (1944); Housing Authority of Shreveport v. Green, 200 La.
City of New Orleans v. Dromgool 166 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Persson, 203 La.
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Co. 165 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Texas Pipe Line Co. v. Barbe, 229 La.
State v. Brooks 152 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
255 , ; , ; City of New Orleans v. Noto, 217 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. O'Neal 149 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Bourgeois 146 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
255 , , and that replacement cost is not 'a fair method of calculating the value of improved property.'
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Olivier 145 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1962
255 , ; , ; City of New Orleans v. Noto, 217 La.
Greater Baton Rouge Consol. Sewer Dist. v. Nelson 144 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
532 , ; Central Louisiana Electric Co. v. Rice, La.App., ; , .
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Kemp 141 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Bundy 143 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
255 , ; , ; City of New Orleans v. Noto, 217 La.
Central Louisiana Electric Co. v. Mire 140 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Texas Pipe Line Co. v. Barbe, 229 La.
City of Natchitoches v. Cox 135 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
and the many cases cited therein.
United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Nezat 136 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
The law on the subject of compensation and damages is stated in the case of Louisiana Highway Commission v. Israel (1944), , , in the following language, namely: "The law is well settled, and counsel for the respective litigants agree, that the amount due for private property expropriated for public purposes is its *80 market value when taken.
Texas Gas Transmission Corporation v. Fuselier 133 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
916 in the following language, namely: "The law is well settled, and counsel for the respective litigants agree, that the amount due for private property expropriated for public purposes is its market value when taken.
Texas Gas Transmission Corporation v. Fontenot 133 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
in the following language, namely: "The law is well settled, and counsel for the respective litigants agree, that the amount due for private property expropriated for public purposes is its market value when taken.
Central Louisiana Electric Co. v. Harang 131 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Texas Pipe Line Co. v. Barbe, 229 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. McNeely 130 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
255 , ; , ; City of New Orleans v. Noto, 217 La.
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. Morehouse Realty Co. 126 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Edwards 119 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
"Furthermore, compensation is due to the owner not only for the value of the property actually taken but also for damage caused to his remaining portion after the taking," , ; such latter compensation being termed "severance" damages.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Havard 118 So. 2d 131 La. 1960
255 , ; , ; City of New Orleans v. Noto, 217 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Esnard 117 So. 2d 52 La. 1960
2d 853 ; , ; City of New Orleans v. Noto, 217 La.
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Mortallaro 101 So. 2d 450 La. 1958
255 , ; , ; City of New Orleans v. Noto, 217 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Ragusa 99 So. 2d 20 La. 1958
255 , ; , ; City of New Orleans v. Noto, 217 La.
Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Dileo 79 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Furthermore, "compensation is due to the owner not only for the value of the property actually taken but also for damage caused to his remaining portion after the taking", , , see also LSA-R.S.
Louisiana Rural Electric Co. v. Wimberley 69 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
La.Const., Art. 1, § 2; , , and numerous cases cited therein.” Applying, this rule, it would seem from the evidence that the value set by the trial court for acreage is reasonable and proper.
Housing Authority v. Brinkmann 69 So. 2d 37 La. 1953
624 , ; , ; Louisiana Highway Commission v. Paciera, supra; State v. Barbe, 209 La.
American Tel. & Tel. Co. v. EAST AND REALTY CO. 66 So. 2d 327 La. 1953
La.Const.,1 Art. 1, § 2; supra; , , and numerous cases cited therein.
Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Callahan 65 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1953
the court recognized the rule that market value of property is its fair value between one who wants to purchase and one who wants to sell under ordinary and usual circumstances.
City of New Orleans v. Noto 47 So. 2d 36 La. 1950
255 , , and that replacement cost is not “a fair method of calculating the value of improved property.” Texas Pacific-Missouri Pacific Terminal R. v. Rouprich, 166 La.
Department of Highways v. Wall 32 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
784 , ; , ; State v. Barbe, 209 La.
State v. Barbe 24 So. 2d 372 La. 1945
State v. Dowling 18 So. 2d 616 La. 1944
Louisiana Highway Commission v. Paciera 18 So. 2d 193 La. 1944
we this day handed down an opinion affirming a judgment based on the award of a jury of freeholders of $4,500 for a larger tract of land in the immediate vicinity of the land in controversy herein and the damage caused other property by the taking.