Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Louisiana Highway Commission v. McCain, 1 So. 2d 545.

26 citing documents.

Valliant v. State, Dept. of Transportation 424 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
(1941); Ville Platte Concrete v. Western Cas.
Ville Platte Concrete Service, Inc. v. Western Cas. & Sur. Co. 399 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Bullard v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEVELOPMENT 394 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Construction Materials, Inc. v. American Fidelity Fire Ins. Co. 388 So. 2d 365 La. 1980
v. McCain, , (1941); Long Bell Lumber Co. v. S. D. Carr Const. Co., 172 La.
CONST. MATERIALS, INC. v. American Fidelity Fire Ins. Co. 383 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
438 (1931); , (1941); (La.App.
Slagle-Johnson Lumber Co. v. Landis Const. Co. 379 So. 2d 479 La. 1980
Carr Oil Co. v. Donald G. Lambert Contractor, Inc. 380 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
(1941); Miller v. Bonner, 163 La.
Slagle-Johnson Lumber, Inc. v. Landis Construction Co. 366 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
On the other hand, it is equally well settled that the instrumentalities forming a part of the contractor’s plant or equipment used in doing the work which survive the performance and remain the property of their owner after the completion of the contract are not covered by the bond .” , (1941); B. & G. Crane Service, (La.App.
Harvey Canal Towing Co., Inc. v. Gulf South Dredging Co., Inc. 345 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
(1941) and Mayeaux v. Lamco, Inc., (La.
Best Electric Supply Company, Inc. v. Rittiner 334 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
[2] , ; John H. Murphy Iron Works v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 169 La.
EL Burns Co., Inc. v. Cashio 302 So. 2d 297 La. 1974
See: , (1941); Long Bell Lumber Co. v. Carr Const. Co., 172 La.
E. L. Burns Co. v. Cashio 289 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Levingston Supply Co. v. Great American Insurance 225 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Relying on the case of Louisiana Highway Commission v. McCain (1941) , , defendants contend that plaintiff cannot have a lien for materials which were not called for in the plans and specifications for the job, and which could not have been incorporated in the job.
RJ Ducote Contractor, Inc. v. LH Bossier, Inc. 192 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
See Louisiana Highway Commission v. McCain, 1941, , ; Goldberg v. Banta Bros., 1935, 183 La.
Mayeaux v. Lamco, Inc. 180 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
is illustrative: "It appears to be well settled that materials which form a component part of the completed structure or are consumed in the work are considered covered by the contractor's bond given under *429 the provisions of Act No. 224 of 1918 and that the surety on such bond is liable theref
Patent Scaffolding Co. v. Ross Corporation 172 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
438 (1931); , (1941) (La.App.
Moretti-Harrah Marble Co. v. J. C. Champagne, Inc. 158 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Louisiana Highway Commission v. McCain (1941), , ; B & G Crane Service, Inc. v. Anderson Bros., Corp., La.App., (1961).” “One of the purposes of the Public Works Act is to substitute an action against the general contractor and his surety for the lien against the works constructed which would ordinarily accrue under the general law.
Waldrip Tire & Supply Co. v. Campbell Construction Co. 158 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Rester v. Moody & Stewart, *467 supra; , ; B. & G. Crane Service, Inc. v. Anderson Bros. Corp., La.App.
York Corporation v. Louisiana Plumbing Co., Inc. 151 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Louisiana Highway Commission v. McCain (1941), , ; B. & G. Crane Service, Inc. v. Anderson Bros., Corp., La.App., (1961).
Martinolich v. Albert 143 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
In Louisiana Highway Commission v. McCain, Supreme Court, , , the Court stated: "The liability of the surety on a bond of this nature is governed by Act No. 224 of 1918, as amended by Act No. 271 of 1926.
B. & G. Crane Service, Inc. v. Anderson Bros. Corp. 132 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
438 ; , ; Colonial Creosoting Co. v. Perry, 169 La.
National Surety Corp. v. Highland Park Country Club, Inc. 111 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
182 , , , in both of which cases the Supreme Court denied claims for the rental of construction machinery and for the cost of repairs of the contractor’s machinery, respectively.
Melancon v. Mizell 37 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
See *Page 56 , ; John H. Murphy Iron Works v. United States Fidelity Guaranty Co., 169 La.
Hughes v. Will 35 So. 2d 241 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1948
See, also, , , 548, in which appears the following: "The equipment involved herein does not form a part of the completed structure and was not consumed in the prosecution of the work.
Parkerson v. Home Protection Service 24 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
548; John H. Murphy Iron Works v. U.S. Fidelity Guaranty Co., 169 La.
Terrebonne Lumber Supply Co. v. Favret 2 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
690 , and the recent case of Louisiana Highway Commission v. McCain, La.Sup., .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by