Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hope v. Madison, 193 So. 666.

51 citing documents.

Gautney v. Gautney 814 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
O'ROURKE v. Cairns 683 So. 2d 697 La. 1996
Lamana v. LeBlanc 526 So. 2d 1107 La. 1988
Ryan v. Grandison Trust 504 So. 2d 844 La. 1987
Ryan v. Grandison Trust 490 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Wilson v. HJ Wilson Co., Inc. 430 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Mitchell v. Bertolla, [ ]; Welch v. Crown Zellerbach Corp., [ ]; , 193 So.
Tassin v. Sayes 386 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc. 373 So. 2d 102 La. 1979
Ugulano v. Allstate Ins. Co. 367 So. 2d 6 La. 1978
Mitchell v. Bertolla, supra; Welch v. Crown Zellerbach Corp., supra; , 193 So.
Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc. 353 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Bd. of Com'rs. Etc. v. Hunter Foundation 354 So. 2d 156 La. 1977
Thibodaux v. Burns 340 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Overruled Mitchell v. Bertolla 340 So. 2d 287 La. 1976
Brown v. Globe Tool & Engineering Co. 337 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
Oil Purchasers, Inc. v. Kuehling 334 So. 2d 420 La. 1976
Sliman v. McBee 311 So. 2d 248 La. 1975
Vico Concrete Company, Inc. v. Antley 283 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
Nicholson v. Holloway Planting Company, Inc. 284 So. 2d 898 La. 1973
Bordelon v. Landry 278 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
Johnson v. Sweat 265 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Hayes v. Muller 243 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
In support of that argument defendant cites a number of authorities, , 193 So.
White v. White 233 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
The present suit does not come within any of the exceptions to the general rule, that the doctrine of the commonlaw courts, that res judicata includes not only everything pleaded in a cause but even that which might have been pleaded, does not prevail in Louisiana.’ See Hope v. Madison, [ , 193 So.
Bankston v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. of Hartford 213 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1968
Eugene v. Ventress 209 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Williams v. Humble Oil & Refining Co. 208 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Succession of Delesdernier 184 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
Hayes v. Muller 183 So. 2d 310 La. 1966
Quinette v. Delhommer 176 So. 2d 399 La. 1965
Shell Oil Company v. Texas Gas Transmission Corp. 176 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
Quinette v. Delhommer 176 So. 2d 399 La. 1965
Murray v. McCarthy 175 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Both actions had, as their primary objective, the recognition of Mrs. Pellegrini as the owner of the identical realty, based *413 upon the same title and facts known to her at the time she defended the original action.” , 193 So.
F. Miller & Sons, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 161 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Prestridge v. Humble Oil & Refining Company 131 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
Miguez v. Miguez 128 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Buhler v. Villec 117 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Tucker v. New Orleans Laundries, Inc. 114 So. 2d 866 La. 1959
Taylor v. Williams 107 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
Hart v. Hardgrave 103 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
Fisher v. Rollins 91 So. 2d 28 La. 1956
‘the thing adjudged,’ see Article 2286 of the LSA-Civil Code; , 193 So.
Quarles v. Lewis 75 So. 2d 14 La. 1954
Brown Land & Royalty Co. v. Pickett 75 So. 2d 18 La. 1954
Fortenberry v. Clay 68 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
Quarles v. Lewis 67 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
*109 Although the facts were not similar to the present case, , 193 So.
Cogswell v. Board of Levee Com'rs 35 So. 2d 743 La. 1948
Brown v. Boudreaux 21 So. 2d 44 La. 1945
(As to what constitutes “the thing adjudged,” see Article 2286 of the Revised Civil Code; , 193 So.
Bullis v. Town of Jackson 14 So. 2d 1 La. 1943
Leadman v. First Nat. Bank 3 So. 2d 739 La. 1941
Lloveras v. Reichert 200 So. 817 La. 1941
One of these at least is lacking here.” , 193 So.
Mizer v. Tennant 197 So. 748 La. 1940
Lee v. Perkins 197 So. 607 La. 1940
We have held that under the express provisions of Act No. 124 of 1906 attorneys-at-law may acquire by written contract with their clients “an interest in the subject matter .of the suit, proposed suit or claim, in the prosecution or defense of which they are employed.” , 193 So.