DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Fortier v. Gelpi, 197 So. 138.

34 citing documents.

  • McAlpine v. McAlpine 679 So. 2d 85 La. 1996
  • Kellogg v. Kellogg 375 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
  • Cortes v. Fleming 307 So. 2d 611 La. 1974
  • Hope v. Hope 271 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    4th Cir. 1961); , 197 So.
  • Kellogg v. Faust 254 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
  • Followed Johnson v. McAfee 249 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    70 , (1954); Matheny v. Matheny, supra; , 197 So.
  • Leavines v. Leavines 224 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
  • Thiel v. Jambois 212 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
  • Burris v. Burris 197 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    This alimony or pension is nothing more than a pure gratuity which the court may allow and fix in its discretion at an amount not to exceed one-third of the husband’s income, and is revocable when it becomes unnecessary.” As to the amount of alimony, , 197 So.
  • Lucas v. Lucas 157 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
  • Fruehan v. Fruehan 153 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
  • Misko v. Capuder 147 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
  • Hicks v. Hicks 147 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
  • Roberts v. Roberts 145 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
  • Harris v. Harris 127 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    (For instance, while a second marriage does not lessen the duty of a husband to support his first family, nevertheless it may be a factor in determining his ability to pay alimony, , 197 So.
  • Simon v. Simon 127 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    s to the West are necessary to her health is not convincing.” ■ The Court then held as follows: “The test by which the Court must be guided in fixing the amount of the alimony or pension in such cases is not what it takes to support the divorced wife in the manner in which she has been accustomed to live, but what will provide her with ‘ “sufficient means for her maintenance.” ’ , at page 456, 197 So.
  • Rader v. Pegram 126 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
  • Vicknair v. Vicknair 112 So. 2d 702 La. 1959
    It is firmly established by the above cited cases, , 197 So.
  • St. Martin v. Lewis 109 So. 2d 81 La. 1959
    “In Fortier v. Gelpi, supra ( , 197 So.
  • Rabun v. Rabun 95 So. 2d 635 La. 1957
    "In Fortier v. Gelpi, supra ( , 197 So.
  • Rabun v. Rabun 95 So. 2d 635 La. 1957
    “In Fortier v. Gelpi, supra ( , 197 So.
  • Jones v. Jones 93 So. 2d 917 La. 1957
  • Jones v. Jones 93 So. 2d 917 La. 1957
  • Stabler v. Stabler 75 So. 2d 12 La. 1954
    property and earnings of her husband, alimony which shall not exceed one-third of his income * * The test by which the Court must be guided in fixing the amount of the alimony or pension in such cases is not what it takes to support the divorced wife in the manner in which she has been accustomed to live, but what will provide her with “ ‘sufficient means for her maintenance.’ ” , at page 456, 197 So.
  • Brown v. Harris 72 So. 2d 746 La. 1954
  • Richards v. Garth 65 So. 2d 109 La. 1953
  • Wilmot v. Wilmot 65 So. 2d 321 La. 1953
  • Smith v. Smith 47 So. 2d 32 La. 1950
    To this effect, see Player v. Player, supra, , 197 So.
  • Reich v. Grieff 38 So. 2d 381 La. 1949
  • Matheny v. Matheny 18 So. 2d 324 La. 1944
  • Wilson v. Wilson 17 So. 2d 249 La. 1944
  • Miller v. Miller 7 So. 2d 163 La. 1942
  • Abbott v. Abbott 5 So. 2d 504 La. 1941
  • Scott v. Scott 2 So. 2d 193 La. 1941
    In a very recent case, , loc.