Connell v. Medlock
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., May 7, 1962 141 So. 2d 441; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., December 11, 1961 137 So. 2d 494; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., January 9, 1929 119 So. 542; La., October 15, 1893 45 La. Ann. 1176
Connell v. Medlock, 24 La. Ann. 512 (1872).
Cited by
- Parry v. Cox 4 La. App. 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
Opinion text
Wyly, J. The defendant appeals from the judgment confirming the default and giving the plaintiff an attaching creditor’s privilege on his property, the ground for the attachment being that plaintiff was a creditor for five hundred and ninety-one dollars and twenty-five cents, and the defendant was an absentee. The defendant asks for a reversal of the- judgment, on the ground that the writ of attachment was not posted as required by law. It seems that the citation was posted at the door of the courthouse, and the copy of the petition was served on the attorney ad hoe. The sheriff’s return does not mention that he affixed a copy of the attachment to the door of the room in which the court is held. If the defendant is an absentee, “ in such case the sheriff shall serve the attachment and citation by affixing copies of the same on the door of the room where the court in which the suit is pending is held.” C. P. 254. Tliese formalities stand in place of citation served on the defendant, and must be strictly complied with. 3 E. 232; 12 E. 462 ; 9 An. 550. It is therefore ordered that the judgment herein be -set aside, and that' this cause be remanded in order to make service of citation according to law and for new trial. It is further ordered that appellee pay costs of appeal.