Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sharbino, 194 So. 756.

20 citing documents.

State v. Carey 628 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Crosby 338 So. 2d 584 La. 1976
If it were pertinent to this review, we might also note that the assignment is without merit: The evidence shows that Mamon's statement to Campbell, which inculpated both Mamon and Crosby, was made in the presence of Crosby and is thus independently admissible against the latter, , 194 So.
State v. Ford 336 So. 2d 817 La. 1976
However, although inculpatory statements made by others in the presence of an accused may be admissible for such reason, , 194 So.
State v. Smith 322 So. 2d 197 La. 1975
State v. Himel 257 So. 2d 670 La. 1972
State v. McClain 222 So. 2d 855 La. 1969
State v. Pagnotta 220 So. 2d 69 La. 1969
State v. Wright 205 So. 2d 381 La. 1967
State v. White 153 So. 2d 401 La. 1963
s and authorities on the subject too numerous to require citation, to so enlighten the jury with respect to the charge and the proof by which the state seeks to establish it beyond a reasonable doubt, it will “enable the jury to understand and appreciate the testimony as it falls from the lips of the witnesses,” in order that the jury may be assisted in “arriving at the truth.” , 194 So.
State v. Turner 152 So. 2d 555 La. 1963
State v. Hayden 147 So. 2d 392 La. 1962
State v. Augustine 131 So. 2d 56 La. 1961
State v. Davis 111 So. 2d 778 La. 1959
State v. Jones 98 So. 2d 185 La. 1957
State v. Clark 93 So. 2d 13 La. 1957
State v. Cascio 54 So. 2d 95 La. 1951
875 ; State v. Sharbino; , 194 So.
State v. Mattio 31 So. 2d 801 La. 1947
State v. Barton 22 So. 2d 183 La. 1945
State v. White 20 So. 2d 10 La. 1944
State v. Shuff 3 So. 2d 278 La. 1941