Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dark, 196 So. 47.

24 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Center for Tech and Civic Life La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Foti v. Board of Trustees 817 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Hryhorchuk v. Smith 390 So. 2d 497 La. 1980
Mullins v. State 387 So. 2d 1151 La. 1980
Hryhorchuk v. Smith 379 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Prentice v. McGowen 346 So. 2d 1361 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Cosenza v. Aetna Ins. Co. 341 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Bradford v. City of Shreveport 294 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Plaintiffs were employed by the City as policemen and are classified as a “public official” , 196 So.
Houston v. Brown 292 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
This conclusion was said to be dispositive of the case; however, the court declared that the reasoning in Hall, supra, , 196 So.
Jones v. Anderson 277 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
Devillier v. City of Opelousas 247 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
Weinstein, Bronfin & Heller v. LeBlanc 192 So. 2d 130 La. 1966
Weinstein, Bronfin & Heller v. LeBlanc 182 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Thomas v. Evangeline Parish School Board 138 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
State v. Roshto 62 So. 2d 268 La. 1952
Chappuis v. Reggie 62 So. 2d 92 La. 1952
The office of judge of the City Court of Lafayette is an office of the State of Louisiana within the meaning of LSA-R.S: 42:373, , at page 150; 196 So.
State v. Murff 39 So. 2d 817 La. 1949
State v. Clark 24 So. 2d 72 La. 1945
State v. Ward 22 So. 2d 740 La. 1945
State v. Varnado 23 So. 2d 106 La. 1944
State v. Pete 20 So. 2d 368 La. 1944
State Ex Rel. Danziger v. Recorder of Mortgages for Parish 19 So. 2d 129 La. 1944
State v. Morgan 15 So. 2d 866 La. 1943
It is argued on behalf of the State that its contention that relator’s remedy was to apply for a bill of particulars instead of filing a , 196 So.
State v. Vinzant 7 So. 2d 917 La. 1942