Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Carlino v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 199 So. 228.

71 citing documents.

D'Antoni v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. 34 So. 2d 378 La. 1948
The jurisprudence relative to .the prosecution by injured employees of claims for further compensation, where they have returned to the service of their former employer in the same or a different capacity, has been settled by this Court in Carlino v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. , 199 So.
Gilmore v. George W. Garig Transfer 33 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
Daigle v. Higgins Industries 29 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
Fidelity Guaranty Co., , 199 So.
D'Antoni v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corporation 28 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
In his application for rehearing, , 199 So.
Daigle v. Higgins Industries 28 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
Annen v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey 28 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
the other 'hand, plaintiff's counsel prayed for, in their petition, a judgment for compensation for a period of not to exceed 400 weeks, less a credit for the number of weeks during which the plaintiff was employed at the rate of not to exceed $20 per week, , 199 So.
Gautreau v. Maryland Casualty Co. 28 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
897 , *Page 99 , 199 So.
D'Antoni v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corporation 28 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
Brown v. Continental Oil Co. 22 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
Brandon v. W. Horace Williams Co. 22 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
Plaintiff, in oral argument and in brief, cites, , 199 So.
Butzman v. Delta Shipbuilding Co. 21 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
In the case of Carlino v. United States Fidelity Guaranty Company, on rehearing, , 199 So.
Thornton v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. 21 So. 2d 46 La. 1944
Plaintiff’s counsel takes the position that this Court, by its decision in the case of *273 Carlino v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., , 199 So.
Arnold v. Solvay Process Co. 20 So. 2d 407 La. 1944
The decisions of this court to which plaintiff refers us are Carlino v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, , 199 So.
Holliday v. Martin Veneer Co. 20 So. 2d 173 La. 1944
That as we view it, is the holding in the case of Carlino v. United States F. & G. Co., , 199 So.
Thornton v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours Co. 15 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
e one that existed in the Ulmer case, and therefore if the plea of prematurity, based on the same provision of the compensation statute which is here invoked, was properly sustained in that case, , 199 So.
Arnold v. Solvay Process Co. 15 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Holliday v. Martin Veneer Co. 15 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
That as we view it, , 199 So.
McKenzie v. Standard Motor Car Co. 15 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Smith v. Travelers Ins. Co. 13 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Thompson v. Leach McClain 11 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
Phillips v. Wohlfeld 10 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942