Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Perez v. Meraux, 9 So. 2d 662.

25 citing documents.

In Re Hunter 823 So. 2d 325 La. 2002
Plaquemines Par. Com'n Council v. Delta Dev. Co. 502 So. 2d 1034 La. 1987
Cacibauda v. Gaiennie 305 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
536 , (1944); , (1942), enunciate the adverse presumption rule but are inapplicable as precedents to the situation before us. [6] C.C.
Belton v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety, Drivers License Division 277 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Jennings v. Allstate Insurance Company 273 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
In Re Haggerty 241 So. 2d 469 La. 1970
Guillot v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance 229 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
(1942); Centanni v. Centanni, 182 La.
Hughes v. Chrysler Corp. 216 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
578 , ; , ; Marshall v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Co., La.App., ; Veillon v. Sylvester, La.App., ; Storm v. Johnson, La.App., .
Town of Slidell v. Temple 164 So. 2d 276 La. 1964
Vaughan v. Dowling 144 So. 2d 371 La. 1962
931 , ; ; , Prince v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., La.App., ; Malveaux v. Buller, La.App., ; Melancon v. Texas Co., 230 La.
Monk v. Monk 144 So. 2d 384 La. 1962
See, , Succession of Yeates, 213 La.
Malveaux v. Buller 135 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
853 ; , ; Stanley v. Jones, 201 La.
Pilcher v. Standard Accident & Insurance Co. 122 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
id not make any attempt to get her deposition as a witness nor make any reasonable explanation for jiis failure to hold the case open for obtaining her deposition, and that under the settled law of Louisiana it is proper for the court to conclude that the testimony of this witness would have been adverse to Standard Accident Insurance Company, , ; Bates v. Britz, 205 La.
Clevy v. O'MEARA 108 So. 2d 538 La. 1959
Prince v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 106 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Wooten v. Thompson 69 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
853 ; , ; Stanley v. Jones, 201 La.
Doll v. Dearie 41 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
676: "* * * the universal rule is, as stated in 34 C.J. 153, that 'A default admits only what is well pleaded, and therefore in order to sustain a judgment by default, plaintiff's declaration, complaint, petition, or statement, of claim, must allege with clearness and certainty sufficient facts to cons
Succession of Yeates 35 So. 2d 210 La. 1948
853 ; , ; Stanley v. Jones, 201 La.
In Re Reed 22 So. 2d 552 La. 1945
Bates v. Blitz 17 So. 2d 816 La. 1944
In Re Fallon 16 So. 2d 532 La. 1943
*959 Tlie petition represents that this Court held in the case of Perez, District Attorney, v. Meraux, Judge, , , as follows: “Then, too, the striking similarity in the method employed in the handling of these cases by the four principal attorneys who are involved should, in our opinion, have placed him on his guard.” That the defendant, who filed fourteen of the cases, was one of the attorneys referred to by
In Re Armstrong 16 So. 2d 908 La. 1943
This is one of four of such repercussions of the decision rendered in the case of Perez, District Attorney v. Meraux, Judge, , , in which Judge Meraux was removed from the office of Judge of the District Court for the 25th Judicial District, composed of the Parishes of St.
In Re Roy 15 So. 2d 79 La. 1943
Atty., v. Meraux, Judge, , , in which Judge Meraux was removed from the office of Judge of the District Court for the 25th Judicial District.
In Re Nunez 14 So. 2d 680 La. 1943
v. Meraux, Judge, , , that the defendant herein, as Assistant District Attorney, assisted the District Attorney in prosecuting the removal suit against the judge.
In Re Meraux 12 So. 2d 798 La. 1943