DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stone v. Kimball's Heirs, 5 So. 2d 758.

16 citing documents.

  • Future Trends, LLC v. DeGeorge 917 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    1st Cir. *648 1957); , (1942); Federal Land Bank of New Orleans v. Scallan, 179 La.
  • Joshua Inv. Corp. v. HOME SALES COUNSELING 892 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    1st Cir.1957); , (1942); Federal Land Bank of New Orleans v. Scallan, 179 La.
  • Meares v. Pioneer Production Corp. 382 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    See, La.Const.1974 Art. 7, Section 25(A); , (La.App.
  • Verret v. Norwood 311 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    1 Cir. 1957); , (1942); Federal Land Bank of New Orleans v. Scallan, 179 La.
  • Gulotta v. Cutshaw 283 So. 2d 482 La. 1973
    322 , (1958); Staring v. Grace, La.App., (1st Cir. 1957); , (1942); Ward v. South Coast Corporation, *488 198 La.
  • Mayo v. Stoessell 277 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    322 , (1958); Staring v. Grace, La.App., (1st Cir. 1957); , (1942); Ward v. South Coast Corporation, 198 La.
  • Vavoline Oil Co. v. Concordia Parish School Board 216 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
    Ward v. South Coast Corporation, 198 La.
  • Jackson v. Hanna 206 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
    322 , (1958); Staring v. Grace, La.App., (1st Cir.1957); , (1942); Ward v. South Coast Corporation, 198 La.
  • P. M. Realty Co. v. Devitt 199 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    883 , ; Staring v. Grace, La.App., ; Stone v. Kimball’s Heirs, , ; Ward v. South Coast Corp., 198 La.
  • Choate v. O'BRIEN 163 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
  • Staring v. Grace 97 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    619 , ; , ; Pill v. Morgan, 186 La.
  • Stevens v. Johnson 81 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    366 and Stone v. Kimball’s Heirs, , .” Counsel for defendant has directed our attention to the rule a plaintiff in a petitory action must rely upon the strength of his own title and not on the weakness of his adversary.
  • City of New Orleans v. Folkman 71 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Stone v. Kimball’s Heirs, , .
  • Cortinas v. Murray 70 So. 2d 589 La. 1954
    366 and Stone v. Kimball’s Heirs, , .
  • Goodwill v. Smith 29 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    Appellant cites and relies upon the following cases to sustain his contention that Smith, because of the tardy exercise of his rights as owner, in the respects above mentioned, thereby, in effect, abandoned and forfeited his title to and interest in the land, to-wit: , ; Slattery v. Heilperin Leonard, 110 La.
  • Martin v. Serice 8 So. 2d 538 La. 1942
    The case of Stone v. Kimball’s Heirs, , , was a suit to quiet a tax title and has no bearing on the questions propounded by the Judges of the-Court of Appeal for the First Circuit.