Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ward v. South Coast Corporation, 3 So. 2d 689.

20 citing documents.

Michael Smith v. Acadian Ambulance Service, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Crooks v. Department Of Natural Resources 263 So. 3d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
A , , 692 : 'Prescription runs in favor of the state.
Steve Crooks and Era Lea Crooks v. State of La., Department of Natural Resources La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
of 1921.’ A So.2d 689, 692: ‘Prescription runs in favor of the state.
Bradford v. Thomas 344 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
Gulotta v. Cutshaw 283 So. 2d 482 La. 1973
240 , (1942); Ward v. South Coast Corporation, *488 , (1941); Close v. Rowan, 171 La.
Mayo v. Stoessell 277 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
240 , (1942); , (1941); Close v. Rowan, 171 La.
Vavoline Oil Co. v. Concordia Parish School Board 216 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
240 , ; , ; Close v. Rowan, 171 La.
Jackson v. Hanna 206 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
240 , (1942); , (1941); Close v. Rowan, 171 La.
P. M. Realty Co. v. Devitt 199 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
240 , ; , ; Close v. Rowan, 171 La.
Choate v. O'BRIEN 163 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
2d 758 ; , ; Close v. Rowan, 171 La.
Lincoln Parish School Board v. Ruston College 162 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
A , , 692: "Prescription runs in favor of the state.
Wood v. Mayo 121 So. 2d 503 La. 1960
Stevens v. Johnson 87 So. 2d 743 La. 1956
666 ; Prampin v. Southern Chemical Works, Inc., La.App., ; , .
White v. Thomas 85 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
the State in 1913 for the nonpayment of taxes assessed in the name of G. I. Miller for the year Í912; that the property was not redeemed until 1936 and that, since defendant could not acquire title by prescription during the time title was vested in the State, such fact constituted an interruption of the continuity of defendant’s , .
Stevens v. Johnson 81 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
The Supreme Court in Ward v. South Coast Corporation, 1941, , , observed that the assessment of land in the name of one not the owner and its forfeiture for taxes was an irregularity for which the forfeiture might have been successfully attacked' within the period of peremption designated by the statute and the Constitution, but as the forfeiture was never attacked
Saucier v. E. Sondheimer Co. 32 So. 2d 900 La. 1947
Lee v. Harris 19 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
cited in support of defendant's contention, is not in point.
Settoon v. Sharp 19 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
683 ; , ; Byrne v. Commercial Security Co., 7 La.App.
Walker v. Douglas 12 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Stone v. Kimball's Heirs 5 So. 2d 758 La. 1942
and the numerous cases therein cited.