DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Coston v. Coston, 200 So. 474.

27 citing documents.

  • Mills v. Mills 626 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • Larocca v. Larocca 606 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • Larocca v. Larocca 597 So. 2d 1000 La. 1992
  • Mathews v. Mathews 459 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
  • Lapeyrouse v. Lapeyrouse 331 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
  • Breaux v. Breaux 323 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
  • Morrison v. Morrison 316 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
  • Bynum v. Bynum 296 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
  • Hermes v. Deacon 275 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
  • Johnson v. Johnson 268 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
  • Bertrand v. Bertrand 260 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • LaTour v. Fuselier 228 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
  • Daigle v. Daigle 222 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
  • Karl v. Karl 191 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    Hayes v. Hayes, 225 La, 374, (1954); , 200 So.
  • Poole v. Poole 189 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    The Supreme Court in the case of Coston v. Coston (1941) , 200 So.
  • Robicheaux v. Robicheaux 165 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
  • Morris v. Morris 152 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
  • Bosch v. Girradot 143 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1962
  • Baasen v. Baasen 133 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
  • Fister v. Fister 131 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    Although adultery may be established by indirect or circumstantial evidence as well as by direct evidence ( , 200 So.
  • Pilgrim v. Pilgrim 102 So. 2d 864 La. 1958
  • Kendrick v. Kendrick 96 So. 2d 12 La. 1957
  • Kendrick v. Kendrick 96 So. 2d 12 La. 1957
  • Harris v. Harris 81 So. 2d 705 La. 1955
    For instance, the character of the house where the parties met, the circumstances under which they met, and all the facts indicating illicit relations between them may be proved, and it is then for the court to determine whether those facts and circumstances have made out the case.” , 200 So.
  • Hayes v. Hayes 73 So. 2d 179 La. 1954
    While it is well settled that the unfaithfulness of a spouse may be established by indirect or circumstantial evidence forasmuch as, in the nature of things, it can seldom be proven by direct or positive evidence, , 200 So.
  • Savin v. Savin 51 So. 2d 41 La. 1951
  • Guidry v. Allemand 43 So. 2d 611 La. 1949
    *293 For instance, the character of the house where the parties met, the circumstances under which they met, and all the facts indicating illicit relations 'between them may be proved, and it is then for the court to determine whether those facts and circumstances have made out the case.” , 200 So.