Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Snelling v. Adair, 199 So. 782.

59 citing documents.

Daniel J. Saloom, Et Al. v. State Of Louisiana, Department Of Transportation And Development La. 2022
2d 454, 458 (1955); 199 So.
Covey Park Gas, LLC v. Bull Run Acquisitions II, LLC and Beaver River Resources La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
App. 1 Cir. 1946); by the presence of “other descriptive designations” in the deed, So.
Jody Stelly v. Joseph Roderick Bergeron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Wilson v. Head 707 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Williams v. Williams 586 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Gibbs v. Gahagan Land & Timber Co., Inc. 520 So. 2d 1035 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
App.3rd Cir.1981), which, by means of a held that if a deed describes property well enough so that it can be identified and located, it is sufficient to transfer ownership of the property.
Schexneider v. Villejoin 493 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
1st Cir.1974); , 199 So.
Amoco Production Co. v. Slaughter 491 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Northcott Exploration Co. v. Delcambre 489 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
In his reasons for judgment the trial judge said: “The Court, in considering the rule of interpretation of instruments in the case of Sabatier v. Bowie Lumber Company, 56 So.2d (sic) 628, Snelling v. Adain [ ] 199 So.
Agoff v. Touchard 420 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
It is true, as contended by counsel for Boutte, , 199 So.
Brasseaux v. Reaux 394 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Bd. of Com'rs. Etc. v. Hunter Foundation 354 So. 2d 156 La. 1977
McCullouch Oil Corp. v. Villejoin 336 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Valvoline Oil Company v. Krauss 335 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Stafford v. Evans 336 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Hanna v. Green 329 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
Authement v. Theriot 292 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Pure Oil Company v. Skinner 284 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
Wurzlow v. Placid Oil Company 279 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Tinney v. Lauve 280 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
[5] See J. H. Jenkins Contractors, Inc. v. Farriel, supra, footnote 4; , 199 So.
JH Jenkins Contractors, Inc. v. Farriel 246 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Placid Oil Co. v. Young 246 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
White v. Phillips Petroleum Company 232 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
Clark v. Lee 221 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
P. M. Realty Co. v. Devitt 199 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Acosta v. Nunez, La.App., ; , 199 So.
Alexander v. Bates 192 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Noel v. Jumonville Pipe and MacHinery Company 158 So. 2d 179 La. 1963
Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. Knapp 156 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Boudoin 154 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Chauvin v. LeBlanc 148 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Thibodeaux v. Comeaux 145 So. 2d 1 La. 1962
Monk v. Monk 144 So. 2d 384 La. 1962
Wiggs v. Warren Realty Co. 106 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Blevins v. Manufacturers Record Publishing Co. 105 So. 2d 392 La. 1958
International Paper Co. v. Masters 103 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
984 ; Snelling v. Adair, 1940, , 199 So.
Callahan v. Authement 99 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Canterberry v. Slade Brothers 96 So. 2d 4 La. 1957
Boudreaux v. Olin Industries, Inc. 94 So. 2d 417 La. 1957
Bruce v. Cheramie 93 So. 2d 202 La. 1956
Scorsune v. State 88 So. 2d 211 La. 1956
Ryan v. Ribbeck 83 So. 2d 650 La. 1955
Koerber v. City of New Orleans 84 So. 2d 454 La. 1955
Texas Company v. O'MEARA 82 So. 2d 769 La. 1955
The Minnafo-Bollinger deed ‘reasonably identified’ Lots 3 and 6'as the property conveyed, under the doctrine, of Snelling v. Adair, 1941, , 199 So.
Jacobs v. Southern Advance Bag & Paper Company 82 So. 2d 765 La. 1955
Gaylord Container Corp. v. Stilley 79 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Despite this clerical error, the property sold from its physical measurements and extrinsic evidence can definitely be identified as Lot No. 5, , 199 So.
Properties, Inc. v. Beckman 77 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1954
Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Marks 74 So. 2d 36 La. 1954
Dupre v. Dupre 72 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
by this deed, contending that according to Article 2276 of the LSA-Civil Code, parol evidence is not admissible to alter or vary the terms of the written instrument unless fraud, error, or mistake is shown or unless the instrument is so ambiguous that the true intentions of the parties thereto cannot be determined without the introduction of extrinsic and parol evidence, , 199 So.
Martin v. Carroll 59 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
Doiron v. O'BRYAN 51 So. 2d 628 La. 1951