Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Co., 199 So. 377.

102 citing documents.

Darbonne v. Allstate Ins. Co. 357 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Ortego v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 295 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
South Texas Lloyds v. Guarantee Insurance Co. 299 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Craker v. Allstate Insurance Company 250 So. 2d 746 La. 1971
Fairfax v. American Casualty Co. of Reading 236 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Calais v. Thibodeaux 220 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
Sutton v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 210 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Rowe v. Travelers Insurance Co. 208 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
See also Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Co., Inc., , 199 So.
Hernandez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 192 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
Arnold v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Co. 190 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
684 , (1960); Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce *264 Co., Inc., , 199 So.
Shively v. Hare 189 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Before proceeding to a discussion of the cases cited by plaintiffs and their applicability to the case before us, the comment of our Supreme Court in the case of Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Co. (1940) , 199 So.
Coleman v. Argonaut Insurance 187 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Gros v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company 183 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Cain v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. 178 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Such cases, not all inclusive, are: , 199 So.
PIGGLY-WIGGLY OP. WRHSE. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 174 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
Woods v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. 172 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Eubanks v. Wilson 162 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
LeBlanc v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 162 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Graham v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. 159 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
684 , (1960); Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Co., Inc., , 199 So.
Wollerson v. Arkansas-Louisiana Gas Co. 159 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
992 , L.R.A.1917F, 253 (1917); , 199 So.
Cox v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania 157 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Briley v. North River Insurance 161 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
In seeking to absolve Dixon of liability learned counsel for All State cites and relies upon that line of jurisprudence which holds a motorist colliding with the rear of a vehicle proceeding in the same direction must, to avoid responsibility, , 199 So.
Audubon Insurance Co. v. National Surety Corp. 150 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Plaintiff urges that the instant case comes under the exception to the general rule, , 199 So.
Smith v. Henry 147 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
1 (1936); Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Company, Inc. et al., , 199 So.
Ramsey v. Langston 140 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
Moore v. State 136 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
See Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Company, Inc., , 199 So.
Peats v. Martin 133 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Lewis v. Quebedeaux 134 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
Ardoin v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 133 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Co., Inc., , 199 So.
Robards v. American Automobile Insurance Co. 128 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
1 ; Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Co., Inc., , 196 So.
Broussard v. American Insurance Co. 127 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
McNabb v. Canal Insurance Co. 127 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
generally enunciated .and accepted rule of liability which attaches to motorists, resulting in a conclusion of responsibility for collisions with the rear end of preceding vehicles •on a public highway, or it must be considered as falling under the equally well established exception to the general rule as exemplified in that line of cases beginning with Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Co., Inc., , 199 So.
Ellis v. Nola Cabs, Inc. 124 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Woodall v. Southern Scrap Material Co., La.App., ; Hemel v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., La.App., ; Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Co., Inc., , 199 So.
Brown v. Benjamin 120 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Under the factual circumstances prevailing in this case, we think it clearly comes within the exception noted under the long line of authority, beginning with Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Company, Inc., , 199 So.
Guillory v. Farmers Automobile Insurance 120 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
While, in the King case, the plaintiff was found guilt of contributory negligence, the exception to the general rule is reviewed as follows: “In discussing the foregoing rule, which obliges a motorist to reduce his speed and control his car so that he can stop within the distance in which he can plainly see an obstruction, the Supreme Court in Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Co., Inc., 1940, , 199 So.
Page v. Northern Insurance Company of New York 117 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Co., Inc., , 199 So.
Puissegur v. Louque 113 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Washington Fire & Marine Insurance v. Canal Insurance 110 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Myers v. American Chain & Cable Co. 109 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Byrd v. Elliott 108 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
he generally enunciated and accepted rule of liability which attaches to motorists, resulting in a conclusion of responsibility for collisions with the rear end of preceding vehicles on a public highway, or it must be considered as falling under the equally well established exception to the general rule as exemplified in that line of cases beginning with Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Co., Inc., , 199 So.
Le Blanc v. SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU CAS. INC. CO. 104 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Towles v. Jones 98 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Cavalier 97 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Suire v. Winters 97 So. 2d 404 La. 1957
Washington Fire & Marine Insurance v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. 94 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
This case bears no resemblance at all to Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Co., Inc., , 199 So.
Rizley v. Cutrer 95 So. 2d 139 La. 1957
Malone v. Andrews 91 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
In support- of his contention, plaintiff cites the following authorities: Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Co., Inc., , 199 So.
Senegal v. Thompson 91 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Watkins v. Strickland Transportation Co. 90 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Thus in Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Co. *564 Inc., 1940, , 199 So.
Noland v. Liberty Mutual Ins. 89 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Woodall v. Southern Scrap Material Co., La.App., ; Hemel v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., La.App., ; Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Co., Inc., , 199 So.