Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Puchner v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp., 5 So. 2d 288.

46 citing documents.

Christopher Ayro v. Willstaff, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Corp., So.2d 288 (1941) (on rehearing).
Ayro v. Willstaff, Inc. 153 So. 3d 1156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Corp., , (1941) (on rehearing).
Trahan v. COCO COLA BOTTLING CO. UNITED 894 So. 2d 1096 La. 2005
Corp., , (1941) (on rehearing).
Ronald K. Trahan v. Coke United La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Coca Cola cites Puchner v. Employers’ Liability Assurance Corp., So.2d 288 (1941),1 in support of its position in this regard.
Trahan v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. United 861 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Coca Cola cites Puchner v. Employers’ Liability Assurance Corp., , (1941), 1 in support of its position in this regard.
O'REGAN v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc. 758 So. 2d 124 La. 2000
Corp., , (1941); 13 H. ALSTON JOHNSON, LOUISIANA CIVIL LAW TREATISE, WORKERS' COMPENSATION § 32, at 40 (3d.
O'REGAN v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc. 737 So. 2d 31 La. 1999
Corp., , (1941); 13 H. ALSTON JOHNSTON, LOUISIANA CIVIL LAW TREATISE, WORKERS' COMPENSATION § 32, at 40 (3d ed.1994).
Gauthier v. GENERAL ACC. FIRE & LIFE ASSURANCE CORP. 573 So. 2d 462 La. 1991
However, the trial judge found that the parties had been in good faith in negotiating the compromise, , (1941), declined to impose the penalty provision of La.R.S.
Gauthier v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. 561 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Corp., , (1941); Fontenot v. Goldenstern Pipe & Supply Co., supra.
State v. Spooner 520 So. 2d 336 La. 1988
Corp., , (1942); Homestead Soc.
Desselle v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 482 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
[921] 922, 931 *1012 (1941); see also, 1 Larson, Workers' Compensation, § 1."
Bazley v. Tortorich 397 So. 2d 475 La. 1981
922 , 931, (1941); see also, 1 Larson, Workers' Compensation, § 1.
Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc. 392 So. 2d 398 La. 1980
See Jasmin v. Gafney, Inc., , (1941).
State v. 1971 Green GMC Van 354 So. 2d 479 La. 1977
Corp., , (1942); Homestead Soc.
Pepitone v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company 346 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
Canter v. Koehring Company 283 So. 2d 716 La. 1973
(1941); Dyer v. Rapides Lumber Co., 154 La.
Powell v. Gold Crown Stamp Company 204 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
1st Cir. 1961, writs denied), ; Cahee v. United States Casualty Co. (La.App.2nd Cir. 1956), ; , ."
Chase v. Warren Petroleum Corporation 168 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
Pope v. Coney 119 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
McMorris v. Home Indemnity Insurance Company 107 So. 2d 645 La. 1958
See Puchner v. Employers’ Liability Assurance Corporation, , and Speed v. Page, 222 La.
Wascom v. Miller 101 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Puchner v. Employer’s Liability Assurance Corporation, , 5 So.
McMorris v. Home Indemnity Co. 94 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
At page 827 of 62 So.2d of the Speed case, , 5 So.
Duplechien v. States Exploration Company 94 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Further, the workmen's compensation statute is protective in purpose and is designed to "insure that an employee whose wages were discontinued as the result of injury sustained during the course of his hazardous employment would be paid weekly compensation on which to subsist during the period of his disability," , 292 .
Jenkins v. Pemberton 87 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
799 (Annulled on other grounds), , ; Griffin v. Coal *783 Operators Casualty Co., La.App., .
Trappey v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. 86 So. 2d 515 La. 1956
Corp., , ; Speed v. Page, 222 La.
Griffin v. Coal Operators Casualty Co. 84 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
799 , annulled on other grounds, , .
Coal Operators Cas. Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. 66 So. 2d 852 La. 1953
Puchner v. Employers’ Liability Assurance Company, , ; Archibald v. Employers’ Liability Assurance Corp., 202 La.
Harper v. Ragus 62 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1952
See: Puchner v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corporation, 1941, , ; Cagnolatti v. Legion Pants Company, La.App.1939, 186 So.
Speed v. Page 62 So. 2d 824 La. 1952
The author of this opinion had occasion, in writing the opinion of the Court in the case of Puchner v. Employers’ Liability Assurance Corporation, reported in , , to make a thorough study of the historical background of our employers’ liability act.
Brown v. International Paper Co. 58 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1952
Corp., ( ) ; Barr v. Davis Bros. Lumber Co., 183 La.
Blackwell v. Wimberly 53 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
656 ; Puchner v. Employers’ Liability Assurance Corporation, , ; Atchison v. May, La.App.
Fontenot v. Goldenstern Pipe & Supply Co. 50 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
They were both in good faith and under the holding of the Puchsner [Puchner] v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corporation case [ ], , I will refrain from applying the penalties prayed for.
Jarrell v. Travelers Ins. Co. 50 So. 2d 22 La. 1950
Bourgeois v. J. W. Crawford Const. Co. 36 So. 2d 13 La. 1948
Horovitz on Workmen’s Compensation, pages 1 to 10; Schneider’s Workmen’s Compensation Law, 2d Ed., Volume 1, Sections 1 and 2; Puchner v. Employer’s Liability Assurance Corporation, , .
Neyland v. Maryland Casualty Co. 28 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
Corporation, , , it had been held that when there is a bona fide dispute as to whether the compensation statute applies or as to the duration of the period of disability, a compromise may be entered into between the parties.
Breitung v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours Co. 17 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
Smith v. Maier 16 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
Pope v. Employers Liability Assur. Corporation 14 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1943
Scott v. Caddo Parish School Board 12 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Stewart v. Brown Paper Mill Co. 11 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
Archibald v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. 11 So. 2d 492 La. 1942
Puchner v. Employers’ Liability Assurance Corp., , .
Langston v. Hanbury 11 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
Washington v. Holmes Barnes, Limited 9 So. 2d 35 La. 1942
As was pointed out when the case of Puchner v. Employers’ Liability Assurance Corporation, , , was originally before us. “* * * Under subsection 9 (formerly subsection 8) of Section 8 of Act No. 20 of 1914, as amended, by Act No. 242 of 1928, where there is no dispute, the parties, by agreement, may have the amounts payable as compensation commuted to a lump sum settlement provided (1) the
Scott v. Caddo Parish School Board 6 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
"It is plaintiff's contention that the recent decision by the Supreme Court in the case of Puchner v. Employer's Liability Assurance Corporation [ , ] is determinative of the questions involved here because in the cited case the Court has definitely held that an employer and an employee cannot speculate upon the duration of the period of disability and that the present case is stronger for plaintiff than the Puchner case because it had been alleged t
McCastle v. Architectural Stone Co. 4 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Craig v. Compressed Industrial Gases 7 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
The settlement is also null and void under Section 17 of Act 20 of 1914, as amended by Act No. 38 of 1918, under the authority of the last decision of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, viz., , , 294, decided on May 26, 1941.