Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Housing Authority v. Henry Ericsson Co., 2 So. 2d 195.

25 citing documents.

Lou-Con, Inc. v. Trans-Vac Systems, LLC and Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
determine disputes and controversies by quasi judicial means, thus avoiding the formalities, the delay, the expense, and the vexation of ordinary litigation.’” Id., p. 7, 159 So.3d at 442 ( (1941)).
Master Craft Construction, LLC v. Pronoun, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
determine disputes and 4 controversies by quasi-judicial means, thus avoiding the formalities, the delay, the expense, and the vexation of ordinary litigation.” (La.
Master Craft Constr., LLC v. Pronoun, Inc. 258 So. 3d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Henry Ericsson Co. , , , 199 (1941).
Brice Building Co. v. Southland Steel Fabricators, Inc. 194 So. 3d 1285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
determine disputes and controversies by quasi judicial means, thus avoiding the formalities, the delay, the expense, and the vexation of ordinary litigation.’ ” Mack Energy Co. v. Expert Oil & Gas, L.L.C., 14-1127, p. 7 (La.1/28/15), -42 (quoting Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Henry Ericsson, Co., , (1941) and 3 American Jurisprudence: Arbitration and Award, p. 830, § 2).
Mack Energy Co. v. Expert Oil and Gas, L.L.C. 159 So. 3d 437 La. 2015
Such deference to arbitral awards is consistent with the longstanding recognition that arbitration is intended to “speedily … determine disputes and controversies by quasi judicial means, thus avoiding the formalities, the delay, the expense, and the vexation of ordinary litigation.” Housing Authority of New 7 (1941), quoting 3 AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE: ARBITRATION AND AWARD, p. 830, § 2.
Bernard v. Hildebrand 993 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Montelepre v. Waring Architects 787 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Town of Melville v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America 651 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
In Re Arbitration Betweem US Turnkey Exp. and Psi, Inc. 577 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
(citing *1134 , (1941)).
Mouton v. Jeansonne 573 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
1138 (1881); , (1941); ” In Godeau v. Picheloup Construction Co., Inc., (La.App.
National Tea Co. v. Richmond 548 So. 2d 930 La. 1989
St. Tammany Manor v. Spartan Bldg. Corp. 509 So. 2d 424 La. 1987
North Cent. Util., Inc. v. East Columbia Water Dist. 480 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Rosenbloom v. Mecom 478 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
(1941); Wright v. Round the Corner Restaurants, Inc., (La.App.
Woodson Const. Co., Inc. v. RL Abshire Const. Co. 459 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Bates v. Foremost-McKesson, Inc. 385 So. 2d 478 La. 1980
4th Cir. 1966) , 197 La.
Transcontinental Drilling Co. v. Davis Oil Co. 354 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
9:4201 et seq., a reviewing court may not substitute its own judgment for that of the arbitrators, , (1941)
Firmin v. Garber 353 So. 2d 975 La. 1977
Firmin v. Garber 343 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
(1941), the court quoting from American Jurisprudence, Vol.
Bodman, Murrell & Webb v. ACACIA FOUND. OF LSU, INC. 246 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Article III, Section 36, Constitution of 1921; , (1941); Livingston v. Shreveport-Texas League Baseball Corp., 128 F.Supp.
Girard v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance 198 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
as follows: “In theory, arbitration is a substitute for a proceeding in court, and should not be confused with what takes place where parties refer to selected persons some ministerial duty or some matter involving .
Bergeron v. Gassen 185 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
9:4214; , ; Livingston v. Shreveport-Texas League Baseball Corp., D.C., 128 F.Supp.
MacAluso v. Watson 171 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
Greer v. Lowe 94 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Henry Ericsson Co., 1941, , .
Weingart v. Delgado 16 So. 2d 254 La. 1943
799, Section 255) and the technicalities of punctuation ( , ; 12 Am.Jur.