DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In Re Novo, 9 So. 2d 201.

19 citing documents.

  • Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. McGovern 481 So. 2d 574 La. 1986
    1974); , (1942); Annotation, Attorneys' Misconduct—Degree of Proof, 105 A.L.R.
  • Succession of Lyons 452 So. 2d 1161 La. 1984
  • Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Batson 359 So. 2d 70 La. 1978
  • Louisiana State Bar Association v. Edwins 329 So. 2d 437 La. 1976
  • Louisiana State Bar Association v. Weysham 307 So. 2d 336 La. 1975
  • Louisiana State Bar Association v. Levy 292 So. 2d 492 La. 1974
    1037 , (1943); , (1942).
  • Louisiana State Bar Association v. Brown 291 So. 2d 385 La. 1974
    As this Court held in , (1942): ".
  • Louisiana State Bar Association v. Ruiz 259 So. 2d 895 La. 1972
  • Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Ruiz 259 So. 2d 903 La. 1972
    urpose of proceedings of this character to punish the accused attorney, as in matters of criminal cognizance, but they are inaugurated and entertained as “necessary for the protection of the court, the proper administration of justice, and the dignity and purity of the profession, and for the public good, and the protection of clients,” ’ citing Weeks on Attorneys at Law, Section 80.” , (1942).
  • Louisiana State Bar Association v. Jacques 257 So. 2d 413 La. 1972
    Respondent relies on the case of , for the proposition that there are no standards by which respondent can gauge his conduct.
  • LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOC. v. Powell 195 So. 2d 280 La. 1967
  • Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Powell 178 So. 2d 235 La. 1965
    As pointed out in Thornton’s work on Attorneys at Law, quoted with approval by this court in , , and In re Weber, 202 La.
  • Louisiana State Bar Association v. Wheeler 145 So. 2d 774 La. 1962
  • Louisiana State Bar Association v. Ricard 111 So. 2d 761 La. 1959
    See In re Novo, [ ,] .” The Commissioner properly overruled respondent’s motion to dismiss these proceedings.
  • Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Cawthorn 67 So. 2d 165 La. 1953
    The evidence that he was guilty of such acts, however, must, under the holding of this court , , which is also the universally accepted rule, “be clear and convincing.” [Italics mine.]
  • In Re Reed 22 So. 2d 552 La. 1945
    As pointed out , , the primary purpose of a disbarment proceeding is not punishment, but the protection of the courts and the public, and disbarment should not be decreed if any discipline less severe would accomplish the desired result.
  • In Re Craven 15 So. 2d 861 La. 1943
    “Recommendation of Commissioner “In view of all of the circumstances surrounding the complaints and considering the precedents of this Honorable Court, and in particular the recent case entitled ‘In the Matter of Lee J. Novo’, , , it is the recommendation of *495 the Commissioner that Thomas V. Craven be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six (6) months.” After the Commissioner’s report was filed in this court, the defendant, through Harry McEnerny, Jr., his duly appointed attorn
  • In Re Weber 13 So. 2d 341 La. 1943
    “In disbarment proceedings * * * the evidence not only as to the act which forms the basis of the attorney’s unprofessional conduct but also as to the motive with which the act was done, must be clear and convincing.” , , and the authorities therein cited.
  • Perez v. Meraux 9 So. 2d 662 La. 1942
    See *513 , , handed down May 25, 1942.