Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kramer v. Freeman, 3 So. 2d 609.

24 citing documents.

Cluse v. H & E Equipment Services, Inc. 34 So. 3d 959 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
222 ; and Kramer v. Freeman, [ , (1941)] supra.
Poole v. Winwell, Inc. 381 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
466 (1930) ; , (1941) ; LaFleur v. Brown, 223 La.
Aetna Life & Cas. Co. v. Dotson 346 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
624 , (1967); , (1941); State ex rel.
Ford Marketing Corp. v. First Auto Parts 308 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
383 ; , It is equally well settled that prescriptive statutes are strictly construed, and the facts of the case must bring the action clearly within the specific provisions of the law sought to be applied.
Travelers Insurance Company v. Veal 280 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
In one of the earlier cases, , (1941), a man filed suit to recover property stolen or forceably taken from him by his wife and his mother-in-law.
Federal Insurance Co. v. Insurance Co. of No. Amer. 263 So. 2d 871 La. 1972
466 (1930); , (1941); LaFleur v. Brown, 223 La.
Munson v. Martin 192 So. 2d 126 La. 1966
Smith v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 164 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
9:571, replacing Article 104 of the Code of Practice of 1870), and also the husband's immunity from suit by the wife except in limited instances (recognized by the Louisiana courts, in the absence of statute, as a matter of public policy: , ; Carter v. Third Dist.
Nicholson v. Atlas Assurance Corp. 156 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
9:291 which forbids a married woman to sue her husband for a tort "[a]s long as the marriage continues" is unconstitutional because it denies the right of the wife to sue her husband while it does not deny the right of the husband to sue his wife, ( , ).
Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Boudoin 154 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Continental Casualty Co. v. Ramon 151 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
1037 , ; , ; *528 Morgan’s Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co. v. Stewart, 119 La.
Davis v. Le Blanc 149 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
976 , ; , ; American Heating & Plumbing Co., Inc. v. West End Country Club, 171 La.
Edward Levy Metals, Inc. v. New Orleans Public Belt Railroad 148 So. 2d 580 La. 1963
976 , (1953); , (1941); American Heating and Plumbing Company v. West End Country Club, 171 La.
Schouest v. Texas Crude Oil Co. 141 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Seeling v. Seeling 133 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Since the husband seeks to recover possession of his paraphernal property from his separated wife, , , and cases therein cited, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed, costs to be paid by defendant.
Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Radalec, Inc. 126 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
466 ; , ; United Carbon Company v. Mississippi River Fuel Corp., 230 La.
Spencer v. West 126 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
2d 574 ; Kramer v. Freeman, 1941, , .
Loew's, Incorporated v. Don George, Inc. 110 So. 2d 553 La. 1959
This Court distinctly stated, , , that: “It is the well settled jurisprudence of this State that the character which a plaintiff gives his pleadings and the form of his action govern the prescription applicable.
Devoe & Raynolds Co. v. Robinson 109 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
State v. Younger, 206 La.
Plummer v. Motors Insurance Corporation 96 So. 2d 605 La. 1957
Importsales, Inc., v. Lindeman, 231 La.
Importsales, Inc. v. Lindeman 92 So. 2d 574 La. 1957
466 ; , ; and Lafleur v. Brown, 223 La.
United Carbon Company v. Mississippi River Fuel Corp. 89 So. 2d 209 La. 1956
City Nat. Bank v. Louisiana Sav. Bank & Trust Co. 43 So. 2d 602 La. 1949
wherein a husband sued his wife and mother-in-law for certain items allegedly stolen from him, the husband asked for a judgment condemning the defendants to return the cash and jewelry taken from him and in the alternative for a money judgment for the value of the items so taken.
Reich v. Reich 23 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
615: "* * * there is no prohibition to be found either in the Civil Code or in the Code of Practice against a husband maintaining a suit against his wife.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by