DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Childers, 2 So. 2d 189.

13 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Anthony Scott Tubbs La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
  • State v. Wells 203 So. 3d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    I mi In Adams , the Court referenced two of its prior decisions, , (1941) and State v. Lee, 171 La.
  • Touchet v. Broussard 31 So. 3d 986 La. 2010
    the Court discussed the automatic first offender pardon in the context of habitual offender adjudications and held while it was clear that a full complete pardon by the governor precludes the use of a pardoned offense to enhance punishment, , (1941), an automatic |upardon does not preclude consideration of a first felony conviction in adjudicating a person as a habitual offender.
  • State v. Derouin 778 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Const. art. 4, § 5(E)(1) quoted above; , (1941); and State v. Lee, 171 La.
  • State v. Rollins 749 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Const. art. 4, § 5(E)(1); , (1941); State v. Lee, 171 La.
  • State v. Riser 704 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    Const. art. 4, § 5(E)(1) quoted above; , (1941); and State v. Lee, 171 La.
  • Davis v. Louisiana State Bd. of Nursing 691 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    [5] , (1941); State v. Lee, 171 La.
  • State v. Rolen 662 So. 2d 446 La. 1995
    Const. art. 4, § 5(E)(1), which absolutely precludes the use of a prior conviction as the basis for enhanced punishment following a subsequent offense, , (1941), we know of no other provision in this context "that would require interference with the broad discretion of the legislature in setting up a system of punishment specifically designed *450 to combat certain types of offenses."
  • State v. Adams 355 So. 2d 917 La. 1978
    (1941); State v. Lee, 171 La.
  • State v. Selmon 343 So. 2d 720 La. 1977
    (1941); State v. Lee, 171 La.
  • State v. Williams 326 So. 2d 815 La. 1976
    Although we have held that offenses pardoned by the Governor cannot be counted as a multiple offense, , (1941); State v. Lee, 171 La.
  • State v. Maduell 326 So. 2d 820 La. 1976
    (1941) that a defendant could not be punished as a second offender after a pardon by the governor for a first offense.
  • State v. Hingle 139 So. 2d 205 La. 1962
    219 ; , ; Cf. State v. George, 218 La.