Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Robinson v. Atkinson, 3 So. 2d 604.

13 citing documents.

  • Washington v. Harvey 164 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
  • Davis v. Grain Dealers Mutual Ins. 128 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    1380 ; , ; Collins v. Spielman, 200 La.
  • Allen v. Travelers Insurance Co. 124 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    “As a result we have held that a cotton farm is brought within the purview *373 of the compensation statute because of the use of a borrowed hay cutter, , ; that because of the operation of an automobile in the delivery of milk and of a tractor in farming operations, a farm-dairy becomes a hazardous business, Collins v. Spielman, 200 La.
  • Viator v. New Hotel Monteleone, Inc. 102 So. 2d 461 La. 1958
    303 ; , ; Collins v. Spielman, 200 La.
  • Fontenot v. Fontenot 100 So. 2d 477 La. 1958
    Collins v. Spielman, 200 La.
  • Travelers Fire Ins. v. Savoy 82 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    81 ; Spanja v. Thibodeaux Boiler Works, Inc., La.App., , .
  • Griffin v. Catherine Sugar Co. 54 So. 2d 121 La. 1951
    As a result we have held that a cotton farm is brought within the purview of the compensation statute because of the use of a borrowed hay cutter, , ; that because of the operation of an automobile in the delivery of milk and of a tractor in farming operations, a farm-dairy becomes a hazardous business, Collins v. Spielman, 200 La.
  • Prater v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New York 38 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    Collins v. Spielman, supra; Staples v. Henderson Jersey Farms, La.
  • Richardson v. American Employers' Ins. Co. 31 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
  • Reagor v. First Nat. Life Ins. Co. 28 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
    No. 20 of 1914, plaintiff was led into relying in his pleadings, to a large extent upon a liberal interpretation of that section of the Act, a favorable interpretation or "reading" , .
  • Collins v. Spielman 8 So. 2d 608 La. 1942
  • Stephens v. Catalano 7 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    involved a farmer who operated a motor-driven chopper in connection with his farming operations.
  • Franz v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New York 7 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942