Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Robinson v. Atkinson, 3 So. 2d 604.
- Washington v. Harvey 164 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
-
Davis v. Grain Dealers Mutual Ins.
128 So. 2d 27
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
1380 ; , ; Collins v. Spielman, 200 La.
-
Allen v. Travelers Insurance Co.
124 So. 2d 367
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
“As a result we have held that a cotton farm is brought within the purview *373 of the compensation statute because of the use of a borrowed hay cutter, , ; that because of the operation of an automobile in the delivery of milk and of a tractor in farming operations, a farm-dairy becomes a hazardous business, Collins v. Spielman, 200 La.
-
Viator v. New Hotel Monteleone, Inc.
102 So. 2d 461
La. 1958
303 ; , ; Collins v. Spielman, 200 La.
-
Fontenot v. Fontenot
100 So. 2d 477
La. 1958
Collins v. Spielman, 200 La.
-
Travelers Fire Ins. v. Savoy
82 So. 2d 68
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
81 ; Spanja v. Thibodeaux Boiler Works, Inc., La.App., , .
-
Griffin v. Catherine Sugar Co.
54 So. 2d 121
La. 1951
As a result we have held that a cotton farm is brought within the purview of the compensation statute because of the use of a borrowed hay cutter, , ; that because of the operation of an automobile in the delivery of milk and of a tractor in farming operations, a farm-dairy becomes a hazardous business, Collins v. Spielman, 200 La.
-
Prater v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New York
38 So. 2d 663
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
Collins v. Spielman, supra; Staples v. Henderson Jersey Farms, La.
- Richardson v. American Employers' Ins. Co. 31 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
-
Reagor v. First Nat. Life Ins. Co.
28 So. 2d 527
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
No. 20 of 1914, plaintiff was led into relying in his pleadings, to a large extent upon a liberal interpretation of that section of the Act, a favorable interpretation or "reading" , .
- Collins v. Spielman 8 So. 2d 608 La. 1942
-
Stephens v. Catalano
7 So. 2d 380
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
involved a farmer who operated a motor-driven chopper in connection with his farming operations.
- Franz v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New York 7 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942