Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Westover Realty Co. v. State, 23 So. 2d 33.
-
Collins v. Quinn
366 So. 2d 209
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
Westover Realty Co., , (1945); (La.App.
- Holleyman v. Garbarino 358 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
-
Bradford v. Patterson
159 So. 2d 342
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
are to the effect that the peremption established .for tax sales by the Constitution requiring actions to set aside such sales to be brought within three years, now five years, from the date of the recordation of the tax deeds does not accrue when the owner remains in corporeal possession of the property
-
Parquet v. Parquet
141 So. 2d 444
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1962
687 , ; , ; Board of Com’rs.
-
Kirn v. Pierce
102 So. 2d 90
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
641 ; Westover Realty Co., Inc., v. State, , ; Di Giovanni v. Cortinas, 216 La.
-
Bierra v. Erwin
94 So. 2d 59
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
641 , , , Scheller v. Goode, La.App., , Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Marks, 225 La.
-
Cobbs v. Jackson
85 So. 2d 368
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
See Westover Realty Co., Inc., v. State, , .
-
Robinson v. Mafrige
86 So. 2d 72
La. 1956
409 ; Westover Realty Co., Inc., v. State, , ; Di Giovanni v. Cortinas, 216 La.
-
Allen v. Morgan
80 So. 2d 202
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Other more or less recent cases dealing with this proposition are Kuhn v. Sandefur, La.App., ; Westover Realty Co., Inc., v. State, , ; City of New Orleans v. Meteye, La.App., ; and Scheller v. Goode, La.App., .
-
Doll v. Mallard
77 So. 2d 39
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1955
So.2d 33, 35, the Supreme Court said: “Counsel for plaintiff in his brief refers to Act 175 of 1934, as showing that it is not the policy ;of the State to retain the ownership of property adjudicated to it for delinquent taxes.
-
Steele v. Montgomery
72 So. 2d 16
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
172 , ; , ; Progressive Realty Co. v. Levenberg, 177 La.
- Cortinas v. Murray 70 So. 2d 589 La. 1954
-
Housing Authority v. Banks
69 So. 2d 5
La. 1953
47:2224; Westover Realty Co., , ; Westwego Canal & Terminal Co. v. Lafourche Basin Levee Dist., 206 La.
-
Knapp v. Jefferson-Plaquemines Drainage Dist.
68 So. 2d 774
La. 1953
See Westover Realty Co., Inc., v. State, , .
- Di Giovanni v. Cortinas 44 So. 2d 818 La. 1950
-
City of New Orleans v. Meteye
24 So. 2d 80
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
35, the Supreme Court considered the very question which is presented here, that is, whether the peremption provided in the Constitution, as amended, cures the defects of which the defendant here complains and in that case the Court held that the said peremption cures all of the defects unless the pers