Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Westover Realty Co. v. State, 23 So. 2d 33.

16 citing documents.

  • Collins v. Quinn 366 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
    Westover Realty Co., , (1945); (La.App.
  • Holleyman v. Garbarino 358 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
  • Bradford v. Patterson 159 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    are to the effect that the peremption established .for tax sales by the Constitution requiring actions to set aside such sales to be brought within three years, now five years, from the date of the recordation of the tax deeds does not accrue when the owner remains in corporeal possession of the property
  • Parquet v. Parquet 141 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1962
    687 , ; , ; Board of Com’rs.
  • Kirn v. Pierce 102 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    641 ; Westover Realty Co., Inc., v. State, , ; Di Giovanni v. Cortinas, 216 La.
  • Bierra v. Erwin 94 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    641 , , , Scheller v. Goode, La.App., , Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Marks, 225 La.
  • Cobbs v. Jackson 85 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    See Westover Realty Co., Inc., v. State, , .
  • Robinson v. Mafrige 86 So. 2d 72 La. 1956
    409 ; Westover Realty Co., Inc., v. State, , ; Di Giovanni v. Cortinas, 216 La.
  • Allen v. Morgan 80 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    Other more or less recent cases dealing with this proposition are Kuhn v. Sandefur, La.App., ; Westover Realty Co., Inc., v. State, , ; City of New Orleans v. Meteye, La.App., ; and Scheller v. Goode, La.App., .
  • Doll v. Mallard 77 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1955
    So.2d 33, 35, the Supreme Court said: “Counsel for plaintiff in his brief refers to Act 175 of 1934, as showing that it is not the policy ;of the State to retain the ownership of property adjudicated to it for delinquent taxes.
  • Steele v. Montgomery 72 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    172 , ; , ; Progressive Realty Co. v. Levenberg, 177 La.
  • Cortinas v. Murray 70 So. 2d 589 La. 1954
  • Housing Authority v. Banks 69 So. 2d 5 La. 1953
    47:2224; Westover Realty Co., , ; Westwego Canal & Terminal Co. v. Lafourche Basin Levee Dist., 206 La.
  • Knapp v. Jefferson-Plaquemines Drainage Dist. 68 So. 2d 774 La. 1953
    See Westover Realty Co., Inc., v. State, , .
  • Di Giovanni v. Cortinas 44 So. 2d 818 La. 1950
  • City of New Orleans v. Meteye 24 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
    35, the Supreme Court considered the very question which is presented here, that is, whether the peremption provided in the Constitution, as amended, cures the defects of which the defendant here complains and in that case the Court held that the said peremption cures all of the defects unless the pers